Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 13:2010:457-61.

Integrating direct electronic collection of data from patients into the process of care for eye care professionals

Affiliations

Integrating direct electronic collection of data from patients into the process of care for eye care professionals

David F Lobach et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. .

Abstract

Enabling collection of clinical data directly from patients has the potential to increase data accuracy and augment patient engagement in the care process. Most patient data entry systems have been created independent of electronic health records, and few studies have explored how patient entered data can be integrated in the documentation of a clinical encounter. In this paper we describe a formative evaluation study using three different methodologies through which we identified requirements for direct data entry by patients and the subsequent incorporation of these data into the documentation process. The greatest challenges included ensuring confidentiality of records between patients, capturing medication histories from patients, displaying and distinguishing new and previously entered data for provider review, and supporting patient educational needs. The resulting computer tablet-based data collection tool has been deployed to 30 primary care optometry practices where it is successfully used to document care for patients with glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screen Shots from the Patient Data Entry Module (A & B) and the Provider Data Entry Module (C). See Text for Details.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Workflow for Computer Tablet Use. Aqua boxes = staff tasks, green boxes = patient tasks, yellow boxes = provider tasks.

References

    1. Bachman J. Improving care with an automated patient history. Fam Pract Manag. 2007;14:39–43. - PubMed
    1. Slack WV, Hicks GP, Reed CE, Van Cura LJ. A computer-based medical-history system. N Engl J Med. 1966;274:194–198. - PubMed
    1. Bachman JW. The patient-computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:67–78. - PubMed
    1. Grossman JH, Barnett GO, McGuire MT, Swedlow DB. Evaluation of computer-acquired patient histories. JAMA. 1971;215:1286–1291. - PubMed
    1. Quaak MJ, Westerman RF, van Bemmel JH. Comparisons between written and computerised patient histories. BMJ Clinical Research Ed. 1987;295:184–190. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources