Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 13:2010:517-21.

Creating and Evaluating a Dynamic Study Randomization and Enrollment Tool within a Robust EHRs

Affiliations

Creating and Evaluating a Dynamic Study Randomization and Enrollment Tool within a Robust EHRs

Nareesa A Mohammed-Rajput et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. .

Abstract

Randomized trials are difficult to perform in resource-limited settings. We developed a Randomization and Enrollment Tool (RET) within a live EHRs which automated enrollment, randomization, and data-collection in support of robust EHRs-based randomized interventions. We describe an observational assessment of RET which we piloted at three Kenyan HIV clinics for a decision support trial. We manually evaluated RET's adequacy and accuracy in its core functions. RET enrolled 327/6626 patients, 100% meeting criteria based on EHRs data. Human reviews reveal that only 250 patients (76.5%) should have been enrolled as the EHRs contained inaccurate data for the other 77 (23.4%). 23 eligible patients were also missed through sole reliance on EHRs data. 18 (5.5%) RET-enrolled patients never received the intervention because of missed appointments. An automated randomization tool has potential to reduce human and financial costs of conducting EHRs-based randomized trials, but remains vulnerable to data quality and workflow limitations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
USAID-AMPATH clinical sites
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Randomization and Enrollment Tool (RET) for PCP prophylaxis decision support study

References

    1. Williams F, Boren SA, Williams F, Boren SA. The role of the electronic medical record (EMR) in care delivery development in developing countries: a systematic review. Informatics in Primary Care. 2008;16(2):139–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seebregts CJ, Mamlin BW, Biondich PG, Fraser HS, Wolfe BA, Jazayeri D, et al. The OpenMRS Implementers Network. Int J Med Inform. 2009;19:19. - PubMed
    1. Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ. 1998 Jan 17;316(7126):201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Einterz RM, Kimaiyo S, Mengech HN, Khwa-Otsyula BO, Esamai F, Quigley F, et al. Responding to the HIV pandemic: the power of an academic medical partnership. Acad Med. 2007;82(8):812–8. - PubMed
    1. Tierney WM, Rotich JK, Hannan TJ, Siika AM, Biondich PG, Mamlin BW, et al. The AMPATH medical record system: creating, implementing, and sustaining an electronic medical record system to support HIV/AIDS care in western Kenya. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):372–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources