Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;16(4):408-15.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0202-x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion in characterizing pancreatic tumors: comparison to PET/CT

Affiliations

18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion in characterizing pancreatic tumors: comparison to PET/CT

Mitsuaki Tatsumi et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate that positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion was feasible in characterizing pancreatic tumors (PTs), comparing MRI and computed tomography (CT) as mapping images for fusion with PET as well as fused PET/MRI and PET/CT.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 47 sets of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F -FDG) PET/CT and MRI examinations to evaluate suspected or known pancreatic cancer. To assess the ability of mapping images for fusion with PET, CT (of PET/CT), T1- and T2-weighted (w) MR images (all non-contrast) were graded regarding the visibility of PT (5-point confidence scale). Fused PET/CT, PET/T1-w or T2-w MR images of the upper abdomen were evaluated to determine whether mapping images provided additional diagnostic information to PET alone (3-point scale). The overall quality of PET/CT or PET/MRI sets in diagnosis was also assessed (3-point scale). These PET/MRI-related scores were compared to PET/CT-related scores and the accuracy in characterizing PTs was compared.

Results: Forty-three PTs were visualized on CT or MRI, including 30 with abnormal FDG uptake and 13 without. The confidence score for the visibility of PT was significantly higher on T1-w MRI than CT. The scores for additional diagnostic information to PET and overall quality of each image set in diagnosis were significantly higher on the PET/T1-w MRI set than the PET/CT set. The diagnostic accuracy was higher on PET/T1-w or PET/T2-w MRI (93.0 and 90.7%, respectively) than PET/CT (88.4%), but statistical significance was not obtained.

Conclusion: PET/MRI fusion, especially PET with T1-w MRI, was demonstrated to be superior to PET/CT in characterizing PTs, offering better mapping and fusion image quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Nucl Med. 2008 Mar;49(3):354-61 - PubMed
    1. Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;24(2):89-98 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Med Res. 2006 Feb 21;11(2):58-65 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):405-22 - PubMed
    1. Pancreatology. 2006;6(6):512-9 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources