Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Epstein–barr virus vaccines

In: Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Chapter 72.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Epstein–barr virus vaccines

Andrew J. Morgan et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Primates and their γ-herpesviruses enjoy a largely peaceful coexistence where a balance of power has been reached over evolutionary time. Coevolution probably began before primate speciation and has allowed these viruses to develop sophisticated systems for the evasion of host immune responses. As a consequence, herpesvirus vaccines have been especially difficult to design because of viral latency, persistence, and immune modulation. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) persists for the life of the individual in the face of a range of antibody responses, some of which are virus-neutralizing in vitro and a multitude of cell-mediated responses, including viral-specific CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells and NK cells. At least 95% of the adult population is infected with EBV and, for the vast majority, there are no clinical consequences whatsoever and an asymptomatic carrier state is maintained. It is not clear whether advantages are conferred to humans by lifelong EBV infection, but it is possible that some immunological effects, such as bias of the T-cell receptor repertoire are provided on a population-wide basis. Whether unselective mass vaccination of healthy individuals to prevent or modify EBV infection may cause more problems than it would solve must be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Ablashi D., Bornkamm G. W., Boshoff C., et al. 1997). Epstein–Barr virus and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus. In IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans Lyon: IARC, pp. 497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adhikary D., Behrends V., Mossman A., Wilter K., Bornkamm G. W., Mautner J. Control of Epstein– Barr virus infection in vitro by T helper cells specific for virion glycoproteins. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:805–808. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aviel S., Winberg G., Massucci M., Ciechanover A. Degradation of the Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:23491–23499. - PubMed
    1. Bale J. F., Jr, Petheram S. J., Souza I. E., Murph J. R. Cytomegalovirus reinfection in young children. J. Pediatr. 1996;128:347–352. - PubMed
    1. Blackman M. A., Flano E., Usherwood E., Woodland D. L. Murine gamma-herpesvirus-68: a mouse model for infectious mononucleosis? Mol. Med. Today. 2000;6:488–490. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources