Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Feb;4(2):149-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.012.

Effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis

Seiji Habara et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) for the treatment of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) restenosis.

Background: Because drug-eluting stents (DES) are being used in increasingly complicated settings, DES restenosis is no longer an uncommon phenomenon, and its optimal treatment is unknown.

Methods: This study was a prospective single-blind randomized trial conducted in 50 patients with SES restenosis. Patients were randomly assigned to a PEB group (n = 25) or a conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) group (n = 25). The primary end point was late lumen loss at 6-month follow-up. Secondary end points included the rate of binary restenosis (in-segment analysis) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6-month follow-up.

Results: At 6-month angiographic follow-up (follow-up rate: 94%), in-segment late lumen loss was lower in the PEB group than in the BA group (0.18 ± 0.45 mm vs. 0.72 ± 0.55 mm; p = 0.001). The incidence of recurrent restenosis (8.7% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.0001) and target lesion revascularization (4.3% vs. 41.7%; p = 0.003) was also lower in the PEB group than in the BA group. The cumulative MACE-free survival was significantly better in the PEB group than in the BA group (96% vs. 60%; p = 0.005).

Conclusions: In patients with SES restenosis, PEB provided much better clinical, angiographic outcomes than conventional BA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources