Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction
- PMID: 21353372
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.01.015
Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the incidence and timing of cardiotocographic (CTG) abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal inserts during labor induction.
Study design: This was a secondary analysis of data collected during the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) trial, a multi-site, double-masked, randomized trial of women requiring cervical ripening before induction of labor. The timing, incidence and clinical outcomes associated with CTG abnormalities were analyzed among three study groups.
Results: 1308 subjects were randomized to receive dinoprostone pessary, misoprostol 50 mcg (MVI 50) or 100 mcg (MVI 100) vaginal insert. 6.8% of MVI 50-treated women had a uterine contractile abnormality (hyperstimulation, hypertonus and/or tachysystole) while the study drug was in situ, compared to 17.4% with dinoprostone insert (p<0.001) and 17.3% with MVI 100 (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in incidence of fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities that occurred with the study drug-11.2% with dinoprostone, compared to 9.9% with MVI 50 and 10.7% with MVI 100. Cardiotocographic (CTG) abnormalities while the study drug was in situ occurred later in women treated with MVI 50 (7.5h [6.2-9.8]) compared to dinoprostone (5.5h [4.2-6.6], p=0.003) and MVI 100 (7.0 h [5.7-7.9], p=0.13). Eight participants in MVI 50 group underwent cesarean section secondary to a CTG event that was initially noted with the study drug in situ, compared to eight dinoprostone-treated participants and 16 in the MVI 100 group, but these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Cardiotocographic abnormalities were less frequent and occurred after longer exposure with MVI 50 than MVI 100 or dinoprostone. Clinical outcomes were similar among the groups.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Jan;26(2):127-31. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.703715. Epub 2012 Nov 6. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013. PMID: 22712609 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with dinoprostone and misoprostol cervical ripening.Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;105(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146638.51536.09. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15625147 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19034471 Clinical Trial.
-
Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):627-41. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00021. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16885668 Review.
-
The efficacy and safety of oral and vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone on women experiencing labor: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39861. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039861. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39465774 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Apr 22;9:2321-7. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S64227. eCollection 2015. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015. PMID: 25960635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Nov 12;7:889-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S62372. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26648758 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system events for misoprostol.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 19;15(1):2452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86422-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39828758 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of the use of dinoprostone gel and vaginal insert for induction of labor: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;168(3):1039-1046. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15952. Epub 2024 Oct 14. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39400318 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20927722 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources