Induction of nocebo and placebo effects on itch and pain by verbal suggestions
- PMID: 21353388
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.043
Induction of nocebo and placebo effects on itch and pain by verbal suggestions
Abstract
Physical complaints, such as pain, can be effectively reduced by placebo effects through induction of positive expectations, or increased by nocebo effects through induction of negative expectations. In the present study, verbally induced nocebo and placebo effects on itch were experimentally investigated for the first time. In part 1, the role of verbal suggestions in inducing nocebo effects on itch and pain was investigated. All subjects received the same somatosensory quantitative sensory testing stimuli, that is, mechanical and electrical stimuli and application of histamine, and verbal suggestions to manipulate expectations regarding the stimuli. The suggestions were designed to produce either high expectations for itch (itch nocebo) or pain (pain nocebo) or low expectations for itch (itch nocebo control) or pain (pain nocebo control). Results showed that high itch and pain expectations resulted in higher levels of itch and pain, respectively. When comparing nocebo effects, induced by verbal suggestions, results were more pronounced for itch than for pain. In part 2, verbal suggestions designed to produce a placebo effect on itch (itch placebo) or pain (pain placebo), or neutral suggestions (itch placebo control and pain placebo control) were given regarding a second application of histamine and compared with the first application applied in part 1. Results of placebo effects only showed a significantly larger decrease in itch in the itch placebo condition than in the pain placebo condition. In conclusion, we showed for the first time that nocebo and possibly placebo responses can be induced on itch by verbal suggestions.
Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
You may (not always) experience what you expect: in search for the limits of the placebo and nocebo effect.Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1449-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.028. Epub 2011 Feb 23. Pain. 2011. PMID: 21349639 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Open- and Closed-Label Nocebo and Placebo Suggestions on Itch and Itch Expectations.Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 21;10:436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00436. eCollection 2019. Front Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31293458 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo and nocebo effects in itch and pain.Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014;225:205-14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_12. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 25304534 Review.
-
Minimizing nocebo effects by conditioning with verbal suggestion: A randomized clinical trial in healthy humans.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0182959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182959. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28910291 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Role of conditioning and verbal suggestion in placebo and nocebo effects on itch.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 19;9(3):e91727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091727. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24646924 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo and nocebo effects on itch: effects, mechanisms, and predictors.Eur J Pain. 2016 Jan;20(1):8-13. doi: 10.1002/ejp.750. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Eur J Pain. 2016. PMID: 26417885 Review.
Cited by
-
[Psychological aspects of pruritus and therapy options].Hautarzt. 2016 Aug;67(8):622-6. doi: 10.1007/s00105-016-3825-z. Hautarzt. 2016. PMID: 27341824 Review. German.
-
Functional neurological disorder and placebo and nocebo effects: shared mechanisms.Nat Rev Neurol. 2022 Oct;18(10):624-635. doi: 10.1038/s41582-022-00711-z. Epub 2022 Sep 8. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36075980 Review.
-
Placebo effects on itch: a meta-analysis of clinical trials of patients with dermatological conditions.J Invest Dermatol. 2015 May;135(5):1234-1243. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.522. Epub 2014 Dec 1. J Invest Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25609025 Review.
-
How to prevent, minimize, or extinguish nocebo effects in pain: a narrative review on mechanisms, predictors, and interventions.Pain Rep. 2019 Jun 7;4(3):e699. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000699. eCollection 2019 May-Jun. Pain Rep. 2019. PMID: 31583340 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Open- and Closed-Label Nocebo and Placebo Suggestions on Itch and Itch Expectations.Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 21;10:436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00436. eCollection 2019. Front Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31293458 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amanzio M, Pollo A, Maggi G, Benedetti F. Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids. Pain. 2001;90:205-215.
-
- Arntz A, Claassens L. The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity. Pain. 2004;109:20-25.
-
- Atanassoff PG, Brull SJ, Zhang J, Greenquist K, Silverman DG, LaMotte RH. Enhancement of experimental pruritus and mechanically evoked dysesthesiae with local anesthesia. Somatosens Mot Res. 1999;16:291-298.
-
- Benedetti F. Mechanisms of placebo and placebo-related effects across diseases and treatments. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:33-60.
-
- Benedetti F. The opposite effects of the opiate antagonist naloxone and the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide on placebo analgesia. Pain. 1996;64:535-543.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials