Validating the clinical research nursing domain of practice
- PMID: 21356644
- PMCID: PMC3304545
- DOI: 10.1188/11.ONF.E72-E80
Validating the clinical research nursing domain of practice
Abstract
Purpose/objectives: To develop and validate a taxonomy for the domain of clinical research nursing.
Design: Survey.
Setting: Clinical research settings in the United States.
Sample: A purposefully selected expert panel of 22 nurses who were actively practicing or supervising in a clinical research environment.
Methods: A study team consisting of nurses with experience in clinical research synthesized peer-reviewed articles, academic curricula, professional guidelines, position descriptions, and expert opinion. Using the Delphi technique, three rounds of surveys were conducted to validate the taxonomy. The three sequential questionnaires were completed over five months.
Main research variables: Activities performed by nurses in a clinical research setting.
Findings: A taxonomy for clinical research nursing was validated with five dimensions and 52 activities: Clinical Practice (4 activities), Study Management (23 activities), Care Coordination and Continuity (10 activities), Human Subjects Protection (6 activities), and Contributing to the Science (9 activities).
Conclusions: This study validated activities for direct care providers and nurses with the primary focus of research coordination. The findings identify a variety of activities that are unique to nurses in a clinical research setting.
Implications for nursing: Nurses play an integral role in the clinical research enterprise. Validating a taxonomy for the specialty of clinical research nursing allows for roles to be compared across settings, competency requirements to be defined, and nursing organizations to be guided in the development of specialty certification.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reader poses questions regarding article's methodology.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Nov;38(6):617; author reply 617. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.617. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011. PMID: 22037324 No abstract available.
References
-
- Arant T, Bang S, Boepple P, Halloran L, Parmentier JL, Sauer A, Koski G. Advancing your clinical research career through educational opportunities. Monitor. 2007;21(5):19–23.
-
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals. Certification. 2011a Retrieved from http://acrpnet.org/MainMenuCategory/Certification.aspx.
-
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals. Global chapters. 2011b Retrieved from http://acrpnet.org/GetInfoFor/InternationalChapters.aspx.
-
- Bacon M. Canada. In: Klimaszewski AD, Bacon M, Deininger HE, Ford BA, Westendorp JG, editors. Manual for clinical trials nursing. 2. Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; 2008. pp. 383–390.
-
- Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘expert’ within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher. 2006;14(1):59–70. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources