Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy
- PMID: 21357655
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq187
Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the changes in soft tissue profile related to treatment with Twin Block and Herbst appliances. Sixty Class II, division 1, mandibular retrognathic patients were divided into three groups. Forty patients were randomly allocated to one of two functional appliance treatment groups. The first group comprised 11 girls and 9 boys (mean age= 12.74 ± 1.43 years) treated with the Herbst appliance. The second group comprised 10 girls and 10 boys (mean age = 13.0 ± 1.32 years) who received treatment with Twin Block appliance. The untreated control group included 9 girls and 11 boys with a mean age of 12.17 ± 1.47 years. Mean treatment time was 15.81 ± 5.96 and 16.20 ± 7.54 months for Herbst and Twin Block groups, respectively. The observation period of the control group was 15.58 ± 3.13 months. Pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1) cephalograms were used to evaluate skeletal, dentoalveolar, and especially soft tissue changes. The groups were compared at T0 and T1 using analysis of variance, and treatment/observation differences (T1 - T0) were evaluated with paired samples t-test at P < 0.05 level. Soft tissue convexity, H angle, and mentolabial angle decreased in both treatment groups compared to control. Statistically significant treatment changes were found for mandibular soft tissue measurements in Twin Block group and to a lesser extend in Herbst group. Both appliances reduced the soft tissue profile convexity when the nose is not taken into consideration. Greater advancement of mandibular soft tissues was observed in Twin Block group.
Similar articles
-
Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):164-72. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt013. Epub 2013 Apr 24. Eur J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24663007 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):128-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm121. Epub 2008 Feb 14. Eur J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18281262 Clinical Trial.
-
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27871709
-
Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04027-w. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38409017 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the External Soft Tissue Changes Following the Correction of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion in the Adolescence Period Using Removable and Fixed Functional Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Mar 27;16(3):e57070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57070. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38545423 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional skeletal and pharyngeal airway changes following therapy with functional appliances in growing skeletal Class II malocclusion patients : A controlled clinical trial.J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Sep;80(5):254-265. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00185-7. Epub 2019 Aug 16. J Orofac Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31444543 English.
-
Treatment effects of the MARA appliance and Activator-Headgear combined with fixed appliances in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients: A retrospective longitudinal study.Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Mar 27;27(6):e2221174. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2221174.oar. eCollection 2023. Dental Press J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 36995843 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29534303 Free PMC article.
-
Soft Tissue Esthetic Changes Following a Modified Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Prospective Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):255-260. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1759. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020. PMID: 32904097 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile Changes with Herbst and Twin Block Appliances in Class II Malocclusion Patients: A Perception Study.Turk J Orthod. 2022 Sep;35(3):173-179. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21072. Turk J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36052579 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources