Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Feb 25;17(3):CS34-8.
doi: 10.12659/msm.881438.

Migration of a foreign body into the colon and its autonomous excretion

Affiliations
Case Reports

Migration of a foreign body into the colon and its autonomous excretion

Andrzej Modrzejewski et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

Background: The frequency of foreign body retention in the abdominal cavity ranges from 1 in 100 to 1 in 3000 surgeries performed. Worldwide literature describes only a few cases of the migration of misplaced surgical gauze into the colon.

Case reports: The first case is a 60-year-old patient following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, who excreted (on his own) a cotton sheet 30 × 65 cm after 26 weeks, which did not possess a radiological locator. The latter fact caused diagnostic difficulties in interpreting ultrasonography, CT-scans and abdominal X-rays. Colonoscopy after 4 months following the excretion of the sheet showed flat, stretched ulceration of the colonic wall near the hepatic turn. The second case is a 76-year-old who had undergone several abdominal surgeries, including a classical cholecystectomy and extirpation of the uterus along with related tissues, as a result of cancer and with subsequent radiotherapy. The reason for the last intervention was an occlusion, which required a resection due to abscesses inside the peritoneal cavity. Abdominal pain continued after the surgery. Uroscopy and abdominal X-rays were performed 3 months later, which confirmed the presence of foreign matter in the abdominal cavity.

Conclusions: Most foreign objects that have migrated into the colon will be excreted autonomously, which warrants a conservative assessment. Radiologically-tagged materials should be used, which will greatly ease identification in cases of suspected retention of surgical materials in the abdominal cavity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient I Abdominal cavity X-ray in the vertical position.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient I Abdominal cavity CT scan.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient I surgical gauze spontaneously excreted through the colon.

References

    1. Kaiser CW, Friedman S, Spurling KP, et al. The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg. 1996;224:79–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi JW, Lee ChH, Kim KA, et al. Transmular migration of surgical sponge evacuated by defecation: mimicking an intraperitoneal gossypiboma. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7:212–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zantvoord Y, van der Weiden RMF, van Hooff MHA. Transmular migration of retained surgical sponges. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63(7):465–71. - PubMed
    1. Sara AK, Pander D, Neogi S, Dhir U. Postoperative complications due to retained surgical sponge. Singapore Med J. 2007;48:160–64. - PubMed
    1. Godara R, Marwah S, Karwasra RK, et al. Spontaneous transmural migration of surgical sponges. Assian J Surg. 2006;29:44–45. - PubMed

Publication types