Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;41(1):1-8.
doi: 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.1.1. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Transradial approach as a default route in coronary artery interventions

Affiliations

Transradial approach as a default route in coronary artery interventions

Jang-Young Kim et al. Korean Circ J. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and peri-procedural potent antithrombotic treatments during the past decade have dramatically improved the outcomes of ischemic heart disease. The femoral artery is the vascular route used in PCI in most catheterization labs. However, when the femoral artery is used as the approaching vessel, local hemorrhagic complication is not rare in the era of potent antithrombotics. Recent studies have suggested that peri-procedural bleeding complications after PCI are associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, there has been growing interest in transradial PCI due to rare complications at the puncture site, patient conveniences, early discharge and shortened hospitalization periods. Furthermore, the indications of transradial PCI are expanding to the complex lesion subsets due to the miniaturization of devices used, improvement of devices and techniques, and accumulated experience with the use of transradial PCI. In this review, we discuss the data of transradial PCI as a potential default route in coronary artery interventions, as well as other issues that may raise concerns with transradial PCI.

Keywords: Angioplasty; Coronary arteries; Radial artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Application of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream on radial artery puncture site.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Procedural position of the right and left radial approaches for coronary interventions. A: left radial approach. B: right radial approach.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of outer diameter (OD) between introducer sheath and sheathless guiding catheters (Adapted from reference 31 with authors' permission).

References

    1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:349–356. - PubMed
    1. Yoon J, Lee SH, Lee HH, et al. Usefulness of trans-radial coronary angiography in Wonju. Korean Circ J. 1998;28:1670–1676.
    1. Yoon J, Lee SH, Kim JY, et al. The experience of trans-radial coronary intervention in Wonju. Korean Circ J. 1998;28:1443–1451.
    1. Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR, et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:202–209. - PubMed
    1. Yatskar L, Selzer F, Feit F, et al. Access site hematoma requiring blood transfusion predicts mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:961–966. - PubMed