Differences between the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole--of clinical importance?
- PMID: 21364577
- PMCID: PMC3068499
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.58
Differences between the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole--of clinical importance?
Abstract
Aromatase inhibition is the gold standard for treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women suffering from an estrogen receptor-positive disease. The currently established group of anti-aromatase compounds comprises two reversible aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole and letrozole) and on the other hand, the irreversible aromatase inactivator exemestane. Although exemestane is the only widely used aromatase inactivator at this stage, physicians very often have to choose between either anastrozole or letrozole in general practice. These third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole/Femara (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) and anastrozole/Arimidex (AstraZeneca, Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK)), have recently demonstrated superior efficacy compared with tamoxifen as initial therapy for early breast cancer improving disease-free survival. However, although anastrozole and letrozole belong to the same pharmacological class of agents (triazoles), an increasing body of evidence suggests that these aromatase inhibitors are not equipotent when given in the clinically established doses. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates distinct pharmacological profiles. Thus, this review focuses on the differences between the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors allowing physicians to choose between these compounds based on scientific evidence. Although we are waiting for the important results of a still ongoing head-to-head comparison in patients with early breast cancer at high risk for relapse (Femara Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation trial; 'FACE-trial'), clinicians have to make their choices today. On the basis of available evidence summarised here and until FACE-data become available, letrozole seems to be the best choice for the majority of breast cancer patients whenever a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor has to be chosen in a clinical setting. The background for this recommendation is discussed in the following chapters.
Figures


References
-
- Baum M, Budzar AU, Cuzick J, Forbes J, Houghton JH, Klijn JG, Sahmoud T, ATAC Trialists' Group (2002) Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen vs tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomized trial. Lancet 359: 2131–2139 - PubMed
-
- Bhatnagar AS, Brodie AMH, Long BJ, Evans DB, Miller WR (2001) Intracellular aromatase and its relevance to the pharmacological efficacy of aromatase inhibitors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 76: 199–202 - PubMed
-
- Brodie A, Jelovac D, Macedo L, Sabnis G, Tilghman S, Goloubeva O (2005) Therapeutic observations in MCF-7 aromatase xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 11: 884s–888s - PubMed
-
- Buzdar A, Howell A, Cuzick J, Wale C, Distler W, Hoctin-Boes G, Houghton J, Locker GY, Nabholtz JM, (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trialists' Group) (2006) Comprehensive side effect profile of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: long-term safety analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol 7: 633–643 - PubMed
-
- Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, Bines J, Takatsuka Y, Petrakova K, Dube P, de Oliveira CT (2006) Comparison of anastrozole vs tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the pre-operative ‘Arimidex’ compared to tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106: 2095–2103 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical