Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):934-40.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.60. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care

Affiliations

Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care

M L Tørring et al. Br J Cancer. .

Erratum in

  • Br J Cancer. 2011 Jun 7;104(12):1930

Abstract

Background: The relationship between the diagnostic interval and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. This association was examined by taking account of important confounding factors at the time of first presentation of symptoms in primary care.

Methods: A total of 268 patients with CRC were included in a prospective, population-based study in a Danish county. The diagnostic interval was defined as the time from first presentation of symptoms until diagnosis. We analysed patients separately according to the general practitioner's interpretation of symptoms. Logistic regression was used to estimate 3-year mortality odds ratios as a function of the diagnostic interval using restricted cubic splines and adjusting for tumour site, comorbidity, age, and sex.

Results: In patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of cancer or any other serious illness, the risk of dying within 3 years decreased with diagnostic intervals up to 5 weeks and then increased (P=0.002). In patients presenting with vague symptoms, the association was reverse, although not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Detecting cancer in primary care is two sided: aimed at expediting ill patients while preventing healthy people from going to hospital. This likely explains the counterintuitive findings; but it does not explain the increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. Thus, this study provides evidence for the hypothesis that the length of the diagnostic interval affects mortality in CRC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. FO is the chairman of the Danish Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing identification of incident colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Aarhus County, Denmark, 2004–2005, for whom general practice was involved in diagnosing the cancer. The last criterion could not be determined for patients with nonparticipating GPs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated survival according to the length of diagnostic nterval analysed for colorectal cancer patients presenting with (A) alarm symptoms of cancer or symptoms related to any serious illness and (B) vague or ill-defined symptoms not directly related to cancer or any other serious illness. The solid curves indicate 0–4 weeks; dashed curves indicate 5–11 weeks; and dotted curves indicate ⩾12 weeks from first presentation of symptoms in primary care to diagnosis (the diagnostic interval).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated 3-year mortality odds ratios (ORs) as a function of the diagnostic interval (time from first presentation of symptoms in primary care until diagnosis) analysed for colorectal cancer patients presenting with (A) alarm symptoms of cancer or symptoms related to any serious illness and (B) vague or ill-defined symptoms not directly related to cancer or any other serious illness. We adjusted for tumour site (colon/rectal), Charlson Comorbidity Index (0/1–2/⩾3), age (18–59/60–74/⩾75), and sex. The solid curves indicate adjusted estimates with point-wise 95% confidence limits in grey. The dashed curves indicate crude estimates. The grey spikes show the distribution of the diagnostic intervals on a squared scale. The grey horizontal lines indicate the chosen reference point of 4 weeks (28 days).

References

    1. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2010) Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375: 1624–1633 - PubMed
    1. Auvinen A (1992) Social class and colon cancer survival in Finland. Cancer 70: 402–409 - PubMed
    1. Bako G, Hill GB, Ferenczi L, Hanson J (1988) Factors influencing the survival of patients with cancer of the colon or rectum. Chronic Dis Can 9: 101–104
    1. Barrett J, Jiwa M, Rose P, Hamilton W (2006) Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities. Fam Pract 23: 15–19 - PubMed
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40: 373–383 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms