Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jul;21(7):1535-45.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain

Adrienne van Randen  1 , Wytze Laméris, H Wouter van Es, Hans P M van Heesewijk, Bert van Ramshorst, Wim Ten Hove, Willem H Bouma, Maarten S van Leeuwen, Esteban M van Keulen, Patrick M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker, Marja A Boermeester; OPTIMA Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain

Adrienne van Randen et al. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Head-to-head comparison of ultrasound and CT accuracy in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain.

Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with abdominal pain for >2 h and <5 days referred for imaging underwent both US and CT by different radiologists/radiological residents. An expert panel assigned a final diagnosis. Ultrasound and CT sensitivity and predictive values were calculated for frequent final diagnoses. Effect of patient characteristics and observer experience on ultrasound sensitivity was studied.

Results: Frequent final diagnoses in the 1,021 patients (mean age 47; 55% female) were appendicitis (284; 28%), diverticulitis (118; 12%) and cholecystitis (52; 5%). The sensitivity of CT in detecting appendicitis and diverticulitis was significantly higher than that of ultrasound: 94% versus 76% (p < 0.01) and 81% versus 61% (p = 0.048), respectively. For cholecystitis, the sensitivity of both was 73% (p = 1.00). Positive predictive values did not differ significantly between ultrasound and CT for these conditions. Ultrasound sensitivity in detecting appendicitis and diverticulitis was not significantly negatively affected by patient characteristics or reader experience.

Conclusion: CT misses fewer cases than ultrasound, but both ultrasound and CT can reliably detect common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Ultrasound sensitivity was largely not influenced by patient characteristics and reader experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for subgroups of observers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253:31–46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531090302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shuman WP, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Imaging evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and fever. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):209–212. - PubMed
    1. Puylaert JB. Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:1227–1242. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00120-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. - PubMed
    1. Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging and the acute abdomen. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1193–1194. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6378. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types