Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;68(8):1311-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0648-z. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

Toward the functional analysis of uncultivable, symbiotic microorganisms in the termite gut

Affiliations
Review

Toward the functional analysis of uncultivable, symbiotic microorganisms in the termite gut

Yuichi Hongoh. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Termites thrive on dead plant matters with the aid of microorganisms resident in their gut. The gut microbiota comprises protists (single-celled eukaryotes), bacteria, and archaea, most of which are unique to the termite gut ecosystem. Although this symbiosis has long been intriguing researchers of both basic and applied sciences, its detailed mechanism remains unclear due to the enormous complexity and the unculturability of the microbiota. In the effort to overcome the difficulty, recent advances in omics, such as metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metaproteomics have gradually unveiled the black box of this symbiotic system. Genomics targeting a single species of the unculturable microbial members has also provided a great progress in the understanding of the symbiotic interrelationships among the gut microorganisms. In this review, the symbiotic system organized by wood-feeding termites and their gut microorganisms is outlined, focusing on the recent achievement in omics studies of this multilayered symbiotic system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Termites and their intestinal tract. a The lower termites Coptotermes formosanus. b The interface (wood and humus)-feeding higher termites Termes comis. c The gut of C. formosanus. d The gut of T. comis. F foregut, M midgut. Bars = 1 mm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Microbiota in the hindgut of termites. a Phase-contrast image of the microbiota in the gut of the lower termite Reticulitermes speratus. b Phase-contrast image of the microbiota in the gut of the lower termite Coptotermes formosanus. c Phase-contrast image of the microbiota in the wood-feeding higher termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis. d FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) image of c. Texas-red signals: treponemes; 6FAM (green) signals: a novel group (FibS2) of the phylum Fibrobacteres [72]. Amorphous yellow colors were autofluorescence emitted from wood particles. Bars = 100 μm in a and b and 10 μm in c and d
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cellular symbiosis between gut protists and bacteria. a Phase-contrast image of the anterior region of the parabasalid protist Trichonympha agilis from the termite Reticulitermes speratus. b FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) image of a. Hair-like treponeme cells were specifically detected with 6FAM-labeled probes (green). c FISH image of a. Bristle-like Bacteroidales cells were specifically detected with a Texas red-labeled probe. d Phase-contrast image of T. agilis. e FISH image of d. Rs-D17 cells were specifically detected with a Texas red-labeled probe. Other bacterial cells were detected with a 6FAM-labeled probe (green). f Transmission electron micrograph of Rs-D17. g Phase-contrast image of the parabasalid protist Pseudotrichonympha grassii from the termite Coptotermes formosanus. h FISH image of a P. grassii cell. CfPt1-2 cells were specifically detected with a 6FAM-labeled probe (green). Bars = 20 μm in ae; 0.5 μm in e; 50 μm in g; 10 μm in h. Panels ac, df, and gh were originally published in [107], [122], and [123], respectively, and slightly modified
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic view of the multilayered symbiosis in the termite Coptotermes formosanus. The figure was originally published in [123] and modified here

References

    1. Inward DJ, Vogler AP, Eggleton P. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of termites (Isoptera) illuminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;44:953–967. - PubMed
    1. Lo N, Engel MS, Cameron S, Nalepa CA, Tokuda G, Grimaldi D, Kitade O, Krishna K, Klass KD, Maekawa K, Miura T, Thompson GJ. Save Isoptera: a comment on Inward et al. Biol Lett. 2007;3:562–565. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sugimoto A, Bignell DE, Macdonald J. Global impact of termites on the carbon cycle. In: Abe T, Bignell DE, Higashi M, editors. Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
    1. Vinson SB, editor. Economic impact and control of social insects. New York: Praeger; 1986.
    1. Kambhampati S, Eggleton P. Taxonomy and phylogeny of termites. In: Abe T, Bignell DE, Higashi M, editors. Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiose, ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

LinkOut - more resources