Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 17:5:9.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.

Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training

Affiliations

Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training

Brian Levine et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Executive functioning deficits due to brain disease affecting frontal lobe functions cause significant real-life disability, yet solid evidence in support of executive functioning interventions is lacking. Goal Management Training (GMT), an executive functioning intervention that draws upon theories concerning goal processing and sustained attention, has received empirical support in studies of patients with traumatic brain injury, normal aging, and case studies. GMT promotes a mindful approach to complex real-life tasks that pose problems for patients with executive functioning deficits, with a main goal of periodically stopping ongoing behavior to monitor and adjust goals. In this controlled trial, an expanded version of GMT was compared to an alternative intervention, Brain Health Workshop that was matched to GMT on non-specific characteristics that can affect intervention outcome. Participants included 19 individuals in the chronic phase of recovery from brain disease (predominantly stroke) affecting frontal lobe function. Outcome data indicated specific effects of GMT on the Sustained Attention to Response Task as well as the Tower Test, a visuospatial problem-solving measure that reflected far transfer of training effects. There were no significant effects on self-report questionnaires, likely owing to the complexity of these measures in this heterogeneous patient sample. Overall, these data support the efficacy of GMT in the rehabilitation of executive functioning deficits.

Keywords: executive functioning; frontal lobe; rehabilitation; stroke; traumatic brain injury mindfulness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of GMT vs. BHW on SART errors of omission (top left), SART coefficient of variation (top right), Tower Test Achievement Score (bottom left) and Tower Test rule violations per item (bottom right). *Significantly different from baseline for GMT. The symbols represent the mean values and the error bars represent the SEM.

References

    1. Broadbent D. E., Cooper P. F., FitzGerald P., Parkes K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 21(Pt 1), 1–16 - PubMed
    1. Burgess P. W., Alderman N., Evans J., Emslie H., Wilson B. A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 4, 547–558 - PubMed
    1. Burgess P. W., Alderman N., Evans J. J., Wilson B. A., Emslie H. (1996). “The dysexecutive questionnaire,” in Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome, eds Wilson B. A., Alderman N., Burgess P. W., Emslie H., Evans J. J. (Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company; ).
    1. Cicerone K. D., Dahlberg C., Kalmar K., Langenbahn D. M., Malec J. F., Bergquist T. F., Felicetti T., Giacino J. T., Harley J. P., Harrington D. E., Herzog J., Kneipp S., Laatsch L., Morse P. A. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, 1596–1615 - PubMed
    1. Cicerone K. D., Dahlberg C., Malec J. F., Langenbahn D. M., Felicetti T., Kneipp S., Ellmo W., Kalmar K., Giacino J. T., Harley J. P., Laatsch L., Morse P. A., Catanese J. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 1681–1692 [See comment]. - PubMed