Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep;18(9):2500-5.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1624-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment

Francesco M Boccardo et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively assess the efficacy of the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) to prevent lymphedema after axillary dissection (AD) for breast cancer treatment.

Methods: Among 49 consecutive women referred from March 2008 to September 2009 to undergo complete AD, 46 were randomly divided in 2 groups. Twenty-three underwent the LYMPHA technique for the prevention of arm lymphedema. The other 23 patients had no preventive surgical approach (control group). The LYMPHA procedure consisted of performing lymphatic-venous anastomoses (LVA) at the time of AD. All patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LS). Patients were followed up clinically at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months by volumetry. Postoperatively, LS was performed after 18 months in 41 patients (21 treatment group and 20 control group). Arm volume and LS alterations were assessed.

Results: Lymphedema appeared in 1 patient in the treatment group 6 months after surgery (4.34%). In the control group, lymphedema occurred in 7 patients (30.43%). No statistically significant differences in the arm volume were observed in the treatment group during follow-up, while the arm volume in the control group showed a significant increase after 1, 3, and 6 months from operation. There was significant difference between the 2 groups in the volume changes with respect to baseline after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery (every timing P value < 0.01).

Conclusions: LYMPHA represents a valid technique for primary prevention of secondary arm lymphedema with no risk of leaving undetected malignant disease in the axilla.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources