Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;92(2):152-87.
doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20288. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

Evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine

Robert L Brent et al. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

A risk analysis of in utero caffeine exposure is presented utilizing epidemiological studies and animal studies dealing with congenital malformation, pregnancy loss, and weight reduction. These effects are of interest to teratologists, because animal studies are useful in their evaluation. Many of the epidemiology studies did not evaluate the impact of the "pregnancy signal," which identifies healthy pregnancies and permits investigators to identify subjects with low pregnancy risks. The spontaneous abortion epidemiology studies were inconsistent and the majority did not consider the confounding introduced by not considering the pregnancy signal. The animal studies do not support the concept that caffeine is an abortafacient for the wide range of human caffeine exposures. Almost all the congenital malformation epidemiology studies were negative. Animal pharmacokinetic studies indicate that the teratogenic plasma level of caffeine has to reach or exceed 60 µg/ml, which is not attainable from ingesting large amounts of caffeine in foods and beverages. No epidemiological study described the "caffeine teratogenic syndrome." Six of the 17 recent epidemiology studies dealing with the risk of caffeine and fetal weight reduction were negative. Seven of the positive studies had growth reductions that were clinically insignificant and none of the studies cited the animal literature. Analysis of caffeine's reproductive toxicity considers reproducibility and plausibility of clinical, epidemiological, and animal data. Moderate or even high amounts of beverages and foods containing caffeine do not increase the risks of congenital malformations, miscarriage or growth retardation. Pharmacokinetic studies markedly improve the ability to perform the risk analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abenhaim L, Lert F. Methodological issues for the assessment of clusters of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the workplace: the cause of video display terminal users. J Occup Med. 1991;33:1091–1096. - PubMed
    1. Aeschbbacher Hu, Milon H, Poot A, Wurzner HP. Effect of caffeine on rat offspring from treated dams. Toxicol Lett. 1980;7:71–77. - PubMed
    1. Adén U, Herlenius E, Tang LQ, Fredholm BB. Maternal caffeine intake has minor effects on adenosine receptor ontogeny in the rat brain. Pediatr Res. 2000;48:177–183. - PubMed
    1. Albina ML, Colomina MT, Sanchez DJ, Torrente M, Domingo JL. Interactions of caffeine and restraint stress during pregnancy in mice. Exp Biol Med. 2002;227:779–785. - PubMed
    1. Ames BN, Gold LS. Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:7772–7776. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types