Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control
- PMID: 21371058
- PMCID: PMC3768255
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01219.x
Development of an implantable myoelectric sensor for advanced prosthesis control
Abstract
Modern hand and wrist prostheses afford a high level of mechanical sophistication, but the ability to control them in an intuitive and repeatable manner lags. Commercially available systems using surface electromyographic (EMG) or myoelectric control can supply at best two degrees of freedom (DOF), most often sequentially controlled. This limitation is partially due to the nature of surface-recorded EMG, for which the signal contains components from multiple muscle sources. We report here on the development of an implantable myoelectric sensor using EMG sensors that can be chronically implanted into an amputee's residual muscles. Because sensing occurs at the source of muscle contraction, a single principal component of EMG is detected by each sensor, corresponding to intent to move a particular effector. This system can potentially provide independent signal sources for control of individual effectors within a limb prosthesis. The use of implanted devices supports inter-day signal repeatability. We report on efforts in preparation for human clinical trials, including animal testing, and a first-in-human proof of principle demonstration where the subject was able to intuitively and simultaneously control two DOF in a hand and wrist prosthesis.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Artificial Organs © 2011, International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand.J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Apr 15;244:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 4. J Neurosci Methods. 2015. PMID: 25102286 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stable, three degree-of-freedom myoelectric prosthetic control via chronic bipolar intramuscular electrodes: a case study.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0607-8. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 31752886 Free PMC article.
-
Myoelectric Control Performance of Two Degree of Freedom Hand-Wrist Prosthesis by Able-Bodied and Limb-Absent Subjects.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:893-904. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3163149. Epub 2022 Apr 11. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022. PMID: 35349446 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted muscle reinnervation to improve electromyography signals for advanced myoelectric prosthetic limbs: a series of seven patients.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):591-596. doi: 10.1111/ans.15664. Epub 2020 Jan 28. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31989741 Review.
-
Realizing Efficient EMG-Based Prosthetic Control Strategy.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1101:149-166. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2050-7_6. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019. PMID: 31729675 Review.
Cited by
-
Converging Robotic Technologies in Targeted Neural Rehabilitation: A Review of Emerging Solutions and Challenges.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;21(6):2084. doi: 10.3390/s21062084. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33809721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Design of Adaptive LQR Control Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimization for Prosthetic Hand.Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;10(7):423. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10070423. Biomimetics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40710236 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of a low-cost single-channel myoelectric-interface three-dimensional hand prosthesis.Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(4):303-310. doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.01375. Epub 2019 Jul 15. Arch Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31336417 Free PMC article.
-
Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human-Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics.Adv Mater. 2022 Apr;34(16):e2107902. doi: 10.1002/adma.202107902. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Adv Mater. 2022. PMID: 34897836 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peripheral neural interfaces: Skeletal muscles are hyper-reinnervated according to the axonal capacity of the surgically rewired nerves.Sci Adv. 2024 Mar;10(9):eadj3872. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj3872. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Sci Adv. 2024. PMID: 38416828 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:422–9. - PubMed
-
- Kay H, Newman J. Relative incidence of new amputations. Orth Prosth. 1975;29:3–16.
-
- Glatty HW. A statistical study of 12 000 new amputees. South Med J. 1964;57:1373–8. - PubMed
-
- Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:236–57. - PubMed
-
- Whiteside SR, Alaimo J, Barringer WJ, et al. Practice Analysis Task Force. Alexandria, VA: American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics, Inc; 2000.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical