Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;10(5):795-805.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0936. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

(-)-Gossypol suppresses the growth of human prostate cancer xenografts via modulating VEGF signaling-mediated angiogenesis

Affiliations

(-)-Gossypol suppresses the growth of human prostate cancer xenografts via modulating VEGF signaling-mediated angiogenesis

Xiufeng Pang et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 May.

Abstract

(-)-Gossypol, a natural BH3-mimetic and small-molecule Bcl-2 inhibitor, shows promise in ongoing phase II clinical trials for human cancers. However, whether (-)-gossypol plays functional roles in tumor angiogenesis has not been directly elucidated yet. In this study, we showed that (-)-gossypol dose dependently inhibited the expression of VEGF, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL in human prostate cancer cells (PC-3 and DU 145) and primary cultured human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. Notably, the growth of human prostate tumor PC-3 xenografts in mice was significantly suppressed by (-)-gossypol at a dosage of 15 mg/kg/d. This inhibitory action of (-)-gossypol in vivo was largely dependent on suppression of angiogenesis in the solid tumors, where VEGF expression and microvessel density were remarkably decreased. Furthermore, (-)-gossypol inhibited VEGF-induced chemotactic motility and tubulogenesis in HUVECs and human microvascular endothelial cells and suppressed microvessel sprouting from rat aortic rings ex vivo. When examined for the mechanism, we found that (-)-gossypol blocked the activation of VEGF receptor 2 kinase with the half maximal inhibitory concentration of 2.38 μmol/L in endothelial cells. Consequently, the phosphorylation of key intracellular proangiogenic kinases induced by VEGF was all suppressed by the treatment, such as Src family kinase, focal adhesion kinase, extracellular signal-related kinase, and AKT kinase. Taken together, the present study shows that (-)-gossypol potently inhibits human prostate tumor growth through modulating VEGF signaling pathway, which further validates its great potential in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. (−)-Gossypol decreases cell viability via apoptosis induction and inhibits Bcl-2/Bcl-xL/VEGF signaling in prostate cancer cells and endothelial cells
A, the chemical structure of (−)-gossypol. B, (−)-gossypol inhibited prostate cancer cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. PC-3 and DU 145 cells (5~6×103 cells) were directly treated with or without various concentrations of (−)-gossypol for 48 h. Cell viability was quantified by MTS assay. Columns, mean; bars, standard error; **, P < 0.01 vs. untreated group. C, (−)-gossypol induced potent apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. PC-3 and DU 145 cells were treated with (−)-gossypol for 24 h. The whole cell protein was applied to western blotting analysis. The full length of PARP was cleaved into 89 KD form as indicated. D, (−)-gossypol suppressed the expression of VEGF, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL in human prostate cancer cells and endothelial cells. PC-3, DU 145 and HUVECs were incubated with (−)-gossypol for 24 h. The whole cell protein was harvested and probed with specific antibodies.
Figure 2
Figure 2. (−)-Gossypol suppresses tumor growth and angiogenesis of human prostate tumor xenografts
PC-3 cells were injected into 5- to 6-week-old BALB/cA nude mice (5×106 cells per mouse). After solid tumors established, the mice were subcutaneously treated with or without (−)-gossypol at dosage of 15 mg/kg daily. A, (−)-gossypol inhibited tumor growth as measured by tumor volume. B, the weight of solid tumors in the (−)-gossypol-treated mice was significantly lower than that of the control group. C, anti-CD 31, anti-VEGF and anti-VEGFR2 immunohistochemistry revealed that (−)-gossypol inhibited neovascularization and VEGF expression in solid tumors. D, microvessel density was analyzed by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. Columns, mean; bars, standard error; *, P < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 3
Figure 3. (−)-Gossypol inhibits VEGF-induced viability, chemotactic motility and capillary-like structure formation of endothelial cells
A, (−)-gossypol dose-dependently inhibited VEGF-induced cell viability. HUVECs (6~7×103 cells/well) were starved with serum-free medium and then treated with or without VEGF (50 ng/mL) and various concentrations of (−)-gossypol for 48 h. Cell viability was quantified by MTS assay. Columns, mean; bars, standard error; **, P < 0.01 vs. VEGF alone group. B, (−)-gossypol inhibited cell migration in HUVECs and HMEC-1. Endothelial cells were seeded in the upper chamber of Transwells and treated with different concentrations of (−)-gossypol. The bottom chamber was filled with medium supplemented with 30 ng/mL VEGF. Cells that migrated through the membrane were photographed (magnification, 160×). C, (−)-gossypol inhibited the capillary-like structure formation in endothelial cells. Pretreated HUVECs and HMEC-1 were placed in 24-well plates coated with Matrigel. After 4~6 h, cells were fixed, and tubular structures were photographed (original magnification, 100×).
Figure 4
Figure 4. (−)-Gossypol inhibits VEGF-induced microvessel sprouting ex vivo
Aortic segments isolated from Sprague-Dawley rats were placed in Matrigel-covered wells and treated with VEGF in the presence or absence of (−)-gossypol for 6 d. A, representative photographs of endothelial cell sprouts from aortic rings. B, sprouts were scored from 0 (least positive) to 5 (most positive) in a double-blinded manner. Columns, mean; bars, standard error; **, P < 0.01 vs. VEGF alone group.
Figure 5
Figure 5. (−)-Gossypol is a VEGFR2 kinase inhibitor
A, (−)-gossypol suppressed the activation of VEGFR2 triggered by VEGF in endothelial cell. HUVECs were starved in serum-free medium for 4~6 h, pretreated with (−)-gossypol for 30 min, and then stimulated with 50 ng/mL VEGF for 2 min. The activation of VEGFR2 from different treatments was analyzed by western blotting and probed with anti-phospho-VEGFR2 antibody at Tyr 1175 and Tyr 996 sites. B, the relative optical density was qualified by Image J software. C, (−)-gossypol inhibited VEGFR2 kinase activity in vitro. Dots, mean; Bars, standard error.
Figure 6
Figure 6. (−)-Gossypol inhibits activation of key proangiogenic molecules involved in VEGF signaling
A, (−)-gossypol inhibited VEGF-induced activation of Src, FAK, AKT and ERK kinase in endothelial cells. Several key signaling molecules that mediate angiogenesis were analyzed by western blotting assay. HUVECs were starved in serum-free medium for 4~6 h, pretreated with (−)-gossypol for 30 min, and then stimulated with 50 ng/mL VEGF for 5~20 min. Protein was harvested for the analysis. B, schematic model depicted the (−)-gossypol-mediated antiangiogenic signaling pathway. (−)-Gossypol potentially affected the production of VEGF released from tumor cells and endothelial cells by inhibition of Bcl-2 family protein, and further it blocked the activation of VEGFR2 and intracellular kinases in vascular endothelial cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. - PubMed
    1. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature. 2005;438:967–74. - PubMed
    1. Albini A, Indraccolo S, Noonan DM, Pfeffer U. Functional genomics of endothelial cells treated with anti-angiogenic or angiopreventive drugs. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010;27:419–39. - PubMed
    1. Niu G, Chen X. Vascular endothelial growth factor as an anti-angiogenic target for cancer therapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:1000–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9:669–76. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances