Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;4(1):9-15.
doi: 10.1159/000324546. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

Measuring abdominal adipose tissue: comparison of simpler methods with MRI

Affiliations

Measuring abdominal adipose tissue: comparison of simpler methods with MRI

Lucy M Browning et al. Obes Facts. 2011.

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of 'simpler' techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) devices and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Method: 120 participants were recruited, stratified by gender and BMI (20 men and 20 women within each group: lean, overweight and obese). Measurements included height, weight, WC (at midpoint), DXA L2-L4 fat, and BIA (two whole-body and one abdominal device). MRI was used as the reference.

Results: MRI data showed that men have more VAT than women, (mean 147 vs. 93 cm(2)) despite less TAAT (362 vs. 405 cm(2)). Correlations of simpler abdominal fat measures showed significantly higher correlations with TAAT than with VAT in men and women. Similarly, trunk and whole-body fat measures were significantly more strongly correlated with TAAT than with VAT.

Conclusion: None of the simpler techniques show strong correlations with VAT measured by MRI, but WC, abdominal BIA 'visceral fat level' and DXA L2-L4 fat all show similar and strong correlations with TAAT and may be useful in large scale surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of individual VAT values, divided by gender and BMI groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of individual TAAT values, divided by gender and BMI groups.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatter plots of the relationship between MRI total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT) and simpler measures of abdominal fat: a DXA L2-L4 fat, b midpoint WC, c umbilical WC and d Abdominal BIA ‘visceral fat level’.

References

    1. Rossner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, Santago P, Sobol WT, Crouse JR. Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers - a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obes. 1990;14:893–902. - PubMed
    1. Abate N, Burns D, Peshock RM, Garg A, Grundy SM, Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging. validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1490–1496. - PubMed
    1. Demerath EW, Reed D, Rogers N, Sun SS, Lee M, Choh AC, Couch W, Czerwinski SA, Chumlea WC, Siervogel RM, Towne B. Visceral adiposity and its anatomical distribution as predictors of the metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factor levels. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:1263–1271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, Vasan RS, Murabito JM, Meigs JB, Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, Sr, O'Donnell CJ, Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments. association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116:39–48. - PubMed
    1. Kuk JL, Katzmarzyk PT, Nichaman MZ, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R. Visceral fat is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in men. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:336–341. - PubMed

Publication types