The falling rate of positive penicillin skin tests from 1995 to 2007
- PMID: 21373225
- PMCID: PMC3034425
- DOI: 10.7812/TPP/08-073
The falling rate of positive penicillin skin tests from 1995 to 2007
Abstract
Background: Data on the rate of positive penicillin skin test (PenST) results over time in large populations are rare. The factors that influence positive PenST results are incompletely understood.
Objectives: We sought to correlate demographic variables to the rate of positive PenST results over time in a large group of patients with a history of penicillin allergy.
Methods: RESULTS from the first test for all patients tested for penicillin allergy in the Kaiser Permanente Health Care Program in San Diego County, CA, between 1995 and 2007 are reported. All patients were tested with penicillin, penicilloyl-poly-lysine, penilloate, penicilloate, and amoxicillin.
Results: There were 255 positive PenST results in 3469 individuals. The rate of positive PenST results declined from >10% to <5% during the 13 years studied. The positive PenST result rate could be accounted for by the year of testing (R(2) = 0.56; p = 0.003) without any significant contribution from the patient's age or the time since reaction (TSR). If the TSR was ≤13 years, the relative risk of a positive PenST result was 2.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.6-2.8). If the study subject's age was ≤38 years, the relative risk of a positive PenST result was 2.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.6-2.7). Females reported higher rates of penicillin allergy history than males did (11% compared with 6.6%; p < 0.0001), but there were no significant sex differences in the rate of positive PenST results.
Conclusions: There has been a steady decline in the proportion of positive PenST results between 1995 and 2007, independent of study subject age and TSR. Increasing age and increasing TSR were associated with a lower rate of positive PenST results.
Similar articles
-
Skin testing with penicilloate and penilloate prepared by an improved method: amoxicillin oral challenge in patients with negative skin test responses to penicillin reagents.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Nov;100(5):586-91. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70159-3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997. PMID: 9389285
-
Safely diagnosing clinically significant penicillin allergy using only penicilloyl-poly-lysine, penicillin, and oral amoxicillin.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 May-Jun;1(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013. PMID: 24565482
-
Penicillin Allergy Evaluation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Evaluation of a Comprehensive Penicillin Skin Test Kit.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jul-Aug;7(6):1876-1885.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.040. Epub 2019 Mar 13. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019. PMID: 30878711 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating Penicillin Allergies Without Skin Testing.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019 Mar 22;19(5):27. doi: 10.1007/s11882-019-0854-6. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019. PMID: 30903298 Review.
-
Skin test for diagnosis of penicillin allergy--current status.Ann Allergy. 1987 Sep;59(3):167-70. Ann Allergy. 1987. PMID: 2443043 Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations for the management of beta-lactam intolerance.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Aug;47(1):46-55. doi: 10.1007/s12016-013-8369-8. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014. PMID: 23549754 Review.
-
Is a Reported Penicillin Allergy Sufficient Grounds to Forgo the Multidimensional Antimicrobial Benefits of β-Lactam Antibiotics?Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):157-164. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy557. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 29986019 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Penicillin Allergy Label Increases Risk of Worse Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Oct;9(10):3629-3637.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.054. Epub 2021 Jul 19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021. PMID: 34293501 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Increased Biochemical Control and Late Toxicity in Men With Medication Allergies.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Sep 11;4(6):pkaa081. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa081. eCollection 2020 Dec. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020. PMID: 33409456 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in beta-lactam and penicillin allergy: Beyond the West and focusing on Asia-Pacific.Front Allergy. 2022 Nov 22;3:1059321. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1059321. eCollection 2022. Front Allergy. 2022. PMID: 36483185 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Green GR, Rosenblum AH, Sweet LC. Evaluation of penicillin hypersensitivity: value of clinical history and skin testing with penicilloyl-polylysine and penicillin G. A cooperative prospective study of the penicillin study group of the American Academy of Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1977 Dec;60(6):339–45. - PubMed
-
- Mendelson LM, Ressler C, Rosen JP, Selcow JE. Routine elective penicillin skin testing in children and adolescents: study of sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984 Jan;73(1 Part 1):76–81. - PubMed
-
- Palma-Carlos ML, Palma-Carlos AG, Medina M. “In vivo” and “in vitro” tests in the diagnosis of Beta-lactams allergy. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 May;39(5):157–61. - PubMed
-
- Matheu V, Pérez E, González R, et al. Assessment of a new brand of determinants for skin testing in a large group of patients with suspected beta-lactam allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(4):257–60. - PubMed
-
- Goldberg A, Confino-Cohen R. Skin testing and oral penicillin challenge in patients with a history of remote penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):37–43. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources