Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 20;3(4):265-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0209-5.

Evaluating applicants to a new emergency medicine residency program: subjective assessment of applicant characteristics

Steven F Groke  1 , Troy E Madsen, Laura Strate, Stuart Knapp, Matt Dawson, Susan Stroud, Stephen Hartsell, Virgil Davis
Affiliations

Evaluating applicants to a new emergency medicine residency program: subjective assessment of applicant characteristics

Steven F Groke et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Because of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the Residency Review Committee (RRC) approval timelines, new residency programs cannot use Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) during their first year of applicants.

Aim: We sought to identify differences between program directors' subjective ratings of applicants from an emergency medicine (EM) residency program's first year (in which ERAS was not used) to their ratings of applicants the following year in which ERAS was used.

Method: The University of Utah Emergency Medicine Residency Program received approval from the ACGME in 2004. Applicants for the entering class of 2005 (year 1) did not use ERAS, submitting a separate application, while those applying for the following year (year 2) used ERAS. Residency program directors rated applicants using subjective components of their applications, assigning scores on scales from 0-10 or 0-5 (10 or 5 = highest score) for select components of the application. We retrospectively reviewed and compared these ratings between the 2 years of applicants.

Results: A total of 130 and 458 prospective residents applied during year 1 and year 2, respectively. Applicants were similar in average scores for research (1.65 vs. 1.81, scale 0-5, p = 0.329) and volunteer work (5.31 vs. 5.56, scale 0-10, p = 0.357). Year 1 applicants received higher scores for their personal statement (3.21 vs. 2.22, scale 0-5, p < 0.001), letters of recommendation (7.0 vs. 5.94, scale 0-10, p < 0.001), dean's letter (3.5 vs. 2.7, scale 1-5, p < 0.001), and in their potential contribution to class characteristics (4.64 vs. 3.34, scale 0-10, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: While the number of applicants increased, the use of ERAS in a new residency program did not improve the overall subjective ratings of residency applicants. Year 1 applicants received higher scores for the written components of their applications and in their potential contributions to class characteristics.

Keywords: ERAS; Residency application; Subjective Ratings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Written components
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Task Force on Residency Training Information. Perina DG, Collier RE, Thomas HA, Witt EA. Report of the task force on residency training information (2008-2009), American Board of Emergency Medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(5):653–661. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. SAEM Residency Catalog. <http://www.saem.org/saemdnn/ResidencyCatalog/tabid/680/Default.aspx/>.
    1. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Emergency Medicine. <http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/110emergencymed0701...
    1. ACGME EM RRC: How to Apply for Accreditation in Seven Easy Steps. <http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/home/accreditation_application_process.asp>.
    1. ERAS Timelines and Deadlines. <http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/home/accreditation_application_process.asp>.

LinkOut - more resources