Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;26(3):329.e1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit program in 6 intensive care units in a large health care system

Luisa Franzini  1 , Kavita R Sail, Eric J Thomas, Laura Wueste
Affiliations

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit program in 6 intensive care units in a large health care system

Luisa Franzini et al. J Crit Care. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit (ICU) (tele-ICU) program.

Materials and methods: We used an observational study with ICU patients cared for during the pre-tele-ICU period and ICU patients cared for during the post-tele-ICU period in 6 ICUs at 5 hospitals that are part of a large nonprofit health care system in the Gulf Coast region. We obtained data on a sample of 4142 ICU patients: 2034 in the pre-tele-ICU period and 2108 in the post-tele-ICU period. Economic outcomes were hospital costs, ICU costs and floor costs, measured for average daily costs, costs per case, and costs per patient.

Results: After the implementation of the tele-ICU, the hospital daily cost increased from $4302 to $5340 (24%); the hospital cost per case, from $21,967 to $31,318 (43%); and the cost per patient, from $20,231 to $25,846 (28%). Although the tele-ICU intervention was not cost-effective in patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 50 or less, it was cost-effective in the sickest patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II more than 50 (17% of patients) because it decreased hospital mortality without increasing costs significantly.

Conclusions: Hospital administrators may conclude that a tele-ICU program aimed at the sickest patients is cost-effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Pronovost P, Miller M, Dorman T, et al. Developing and implementing measures of quality of care in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7:297–303. - PubMed
    1. Chalfin D, Cohen L, Lambrinos J. The economics and cost-effectiveness of critical care medicine. Intenstive Care Medicine. 1995;21:952–961. - PubMed
    1. Pronovost P, Angus D, Dorman T, et al. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288:2151–2162. - PubMed
    1. Young M, Birkmeyer J. Potential reduction in mortality rates using an intensivist model to manage intensive care units. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;6:284–289. - PubMed
    1. Angus D, Kelley M, Schmitz R, et al. Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284:2762–2770. - PubMed

Publication types