Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks
- PMID: 21376819
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.070
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies have utilized two primary tasks to assess motor response inhibition, a major form of inhibitory control: the Go/NoGo (GNG) task and the Stop-Signal Task (SST). It is unclear, however, whether these two tasks engage identical neural systems. This question is critical because assumptions that both tasks are measuring the same cognitive construct have theoretical and practical implications. Many papers have focused on a right hemisphere dominance for response inhibition, with the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) receiving the bulk of attention. Others have emphasized the role of the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). The current study performed separate quantitative meta-analyses using the Activation Likelihood Estimate (ALE) method to uncover the common and distinctive clusters of activity in GNG and SST. Major common clusters of activation were located in the right anterior insula and the pre-SMA. Insular activation was right hemisphere dominant in GNG but more bilaterally distributed in SST. Differences between the tasks were observed in two major cognitive control networks: (1) the fronto-parietal network that mediates adaptive online control, and (2) the cingulo-opercular network implicated in maintaining task set (Dosenbach et al., 2007) and responding to salient stimuli (Seeley et al., 2007). GNG engaged the fronto-parietal control network to a greater extent than SST, with prominent foci located in the right MFG and right inferior parietal lobule. Conversely, SST engaged the cingulo-opercular control network to a greater extent, with more pronounced activations in the left anterior insula and bilateral thalamus. The present results reveal the anterior insula's importance in response inhibition tasks and confirm the role of the pre-SMA. Furthermore, GNG and SST tasks are not completely identical measures of response inhibition, as they engage overlapping but distinct neural circuits.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
A functional MRI study of motor dysfunction in Friedreich's ataxia.Brain Res. 2012 Aug 30;1471:138-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22771856
-
Sex and performance level effects on brain activation during a verbal fluency task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Cortex. 2009 Feb;45(2):164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 5. Cortex. 2009. PMID: 19150518
-
Visuomotor transformations for reaching to memorized targets: a PET study.Neuroimage. 1997 Feb;5(2):129-46. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0254. Neuroimage. 1997. PMID: 9345543 Clinical Trial.
-
The "handwriting brain": a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes.Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2772-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Cortex. 2013. PMID: 23831432 Review.
-
Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jan;37(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013. PMID: 23164813 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4297-6. Epub 2015 May 1. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25925996
-
Speed of saccade execution and inhibition associated with fractional anisotropy in distinct fronto-frontal and fronto-striatal white matter pathways.Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2811-22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23209. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016. PMID: 27091670 Free PMC article.
-
Proactive and reactive cognitive control rely on flexible use of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Feb 15;40(3):955-966. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24424. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019. PMID: 30407681 Free PMC article.
-
A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.Elife. 2019 Apr 29;8:e46323. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46323. Elife. 2019. PMID: 31033438 Free PMC article.
-
Right Fronto-Subcortical White Matter Microstructure Predicts Cognitive Control Ability on the Go/No-go Task in a Community Sample.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 13;12:127. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00127. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29706875 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical