Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111.

A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response

Pooja Varshney et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Open-label oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols have been used to treat small numbers of patients with peanut allergy. Peanut OIT has not been evaluated in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of OIT for peanut allergy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Methods: In this multicenter study, children ages 1 to 16 years with peanut allergy received OIT with peanut flour or placebo. Initial escalation, build-up, and maintenance phases were followed by an oral food challenge (OFC) at approximately 1 year. Titrated skin prick tests (SPTs) and laboratory studies were performed at regular intervals.

Results: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the study. Three peanut OIT subjects withdrew early in the study because of allergic side effects. During the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, all remaining peanut OIT subjects (n = 16) ingested the maximum cumulative dose of 5000 mg (approximately 20 peanuts), whereas placebo subjects (n = 9) ingested a median cumulative dose of 280 mg (range, 0-1900 mg; P < .001). In contrast with the placebo group, the peanut OIT group showed reductions in SPT size (P < .001), IL-5 (P = .01), and IL-13 (P = .02) and increases in peanut-specific IgG(4) (P < .001). Peanut OIT subjects had initial increases in peanut-specific IgE (P < .01) but did not show significant change from baseline by the time of OFC. The ratio of forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)(hi): FoxP3(intermediate) CD4+ CD25+ T cells increased at the time of OFC (P = .04) in peanut OIT subjects.

Conclusion: These results conclusively demonstrate that peanut OIT induces desensitization and concurrent immune modulation. The current study continues and is evaluating the hypothesis that peanut OIT causes long-term immune tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cumulative amount of peanut protein ingested at OFC by peanut OIT and placebo subjects (*p<0.001) following 12 months of therapy
Individual subjects are shown as diamonds (peanut OIT) or squares (placebo); lines designate median values.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Titrated skin prick testing
Change in median wheal size from baseline to time of OFC in peanut OIT and placebo subjects (*p<0·001). Boxes represent 25-75% quartiles; whiskers represent range. Lines designate median values.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Changes in serum immunoglobulin levels during treatment with peanut OIT and placebo
(a) Peanut-specific IgE. (*p≤0.01). (b) Peanut-specific IgG. (*p<0.05). (c) Peanut-specific IgG4. (*p≤0.001). Boxes represent 25-75% quartiles; whiskers represent range. Lines designate median values.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Changes in serum immunoglobulin levels during treatment with peanut OIT and placebo
(a) Peanut-specific IgE. (*p≤0.01). (b) Peanut-specific IgG. (*p<0.05). (c) Peanut-specific IgG4. (*p≤0.001). Boxes represent 25-75% quartiles; whiskers represent range. Lines designate median values.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Changes in serum immunoglobulin levels during treatment with peanut OIT and placebo
(a) Peanut-specific IgE. (*p≤0.01). (b) Peanut-specific IgG. (*p<0.05). (c) Peanut-specific IgG4. (*p≤0.001). Boxes represent 25-75% quartiles; whiskers represent range. Lines designate median values.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Changes in secreted cytokine responses for subjects receiving peanut OIT and placebo
PBMCs were cultured with peanut protein for 72 hours; cytokines were measured via ELISA. (a) IL-5. (*p≤0·02). (b) IL-13. (*p≤0·03).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Changes in secreted cytokine responses for subjects receiving peanut OIT and placebo
PBMCs were cultured with peanut protein for 72 hours; cytokines were measured via ELISA. (a) IL-5. (*p≤0·02). (b) IL-13. (*p≤0·03).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Change in FoxP3 hi: FoxP3 intermediate CD4+CD25+ T cells from baseline to time of OFC
PBMCs were stimulated with crude peanut extract and tetanus toxin for 7 days, and then stained for Treg markers. Individual subjects are shown for (a) peanut OIT and (b) placebo groups. *p=0.04.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Change in FoxP3 hi: FoxP3 intermediate CD4+CD25+ T cells from baseline to time of OFC
PBMCs were stimulated with crude peanut extract and tetanus toxin for 7 days, and then stained for Treg markers. Individual subjects are shown for (a) peanut OIT and (b) placebo groups. *p=0.04.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Branum AM, Lukacs SL. Food allergy among U.S. children: trends in prevalence and hospitalizations. NCHS Data Brief. 2008 Oct;(10):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit dial telephone survey: a 5-year follow-up study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;112(6):1203–7. - PubMed
    1. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):191–3. - PubMed
    1. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001-2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):1016–8. - PubMed
    1. Fleischer DM. The natural history of peanut and tree nut allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007 Jun;7(3):175–81. - PubMed

Publication types