Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 21377070
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.005
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Study objective: To determine if the use of ultrasound guidance (vs non-ultrasound techniques) improves the success rate of nerve blocks.
Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the published literature.
Setting: University medical center.
Measurements: 16 RCTs of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were studied. Patients underwent ultrasound-guided or non-ultrasound techniques (nerve stimulation, surface landmark) for peripheral nerve blocks. Success rates were measured.
Main results: Ultrasound guidance (vs all non-ultrasound techniques) was associated with a significant increase in the success rate of nerve blocks [relative risk (RR) = 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.17, P < 0.0001]). When compared with nerve stimulator techniques only, ultrasound guidance was still associated with an increase in the success rate (RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.17, P = 0.0001]). For specific blocks, ultrasound guidance (vs all non-ultrasound) was associated with a significant increase in successful brachial plexus (all) nerve blocks (RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20, P = 0.0001]), sciatic popliteal nerve block (RR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.39, P = 0.002]) and brachial plexus axillary nerve block (RR = 1.13 [95% CI: 1.00 to 1.26, P = 0.05]) but not brachial plexus infraclavicular nerve block (RR = 1.25 [95% CI: 0.88 to 1.76, P = 0.22]).
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block is associated with an increased overall success rate when compared with nerve stimulation or other methods. Ultrasound-guided techniques also increase the success rate of some specific blocks.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Meta-analyses of ultrasound-guided versus traditional peripheral nerve block techniques--are we comparing apples and oranges?J Clin Anesth. 2011 Mar;23(2):87-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.01.001. J Clin Anesth. 2011. PMID: 21377069 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound versus nerve stimulator: what's missing and is it really important?J Clin Anesth. 2012 Mar;24(2):164-5; author reply 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.10.003. J Clin Anesth. 2012. PMID: 22414712 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
