Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial
- PMID: 21382893
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000646
Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial
Abstract
Background: An important determinant of successful cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure is the position of the left ventricular (LV) pacing lead. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the LV lead position on outcome in patients randomized to cardiac resynchronization-defibrillation in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) study.
Methods and results: The location of the LV lead was assessed by means of coronary venograms and chest x-rays recorded at the time of device implantation. The LV lead location was classified along the short axis into an anterior, lateral, or posterior position and along the long axis into a basal, midventricular, or apical region. The primary end point of MADIT-CRT was heart failure (HF) hospitalization or death, whichever came first. The LV lead position was assessed in 799 patients, (55% patients ≥65 years of age, 26% female, 10% LV ejection fraction ≤25%, 55% ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 71% left bundle-branch block) with a follow-up of 29±11 months. The extent of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit was similar for leads in the anterior, lateral, or posterior position (P=0.652). The apical lead location compared with leads located in the nonapical position (basal or midventricular region) was associated with a significantly increased risk for heart failure/death (hazard ratio=1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.71; P=0.019) after adjustment for the clinical covariates. The apical lead position was also associated with an increased risk for death (hazard ratio=2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.42 to 5.97; P=0.004).
Conclusion: LV leads positioned in the apical region were associated with an unfavorable outcome, suggesting that this lead location should be avoided in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
Comment in
-
Device therapy: avoid apical lead position in CRT.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 May;8(5):243. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.54. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21451472 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of the right ventricular lead position on clinical outcome and on the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with CRT-D.Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Heart Rhythm. 2013. PMID: 23973954 Clinical Trial.
-
Left Ventricular Lead Location and Long-Term Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;4(11):1410-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 29. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30466845 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with diabetes enrolled in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT).Circ Heart Fail. 2011 May;4(3):332-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.959510. Epub 2011 Feb 24. Circ Heart Fail. 2011. PMID: 21350054 Clinical Trial.
-
Lessons learned from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Feb;26(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016. PMID: 26051208 Review.
-
Cardiac computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead position and outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;64(3):783-792. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01193-1. Epub 2022 Mar 28. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 35348998 Review.
Cited by
-
Utility of dual-source computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy-DIRECT study.Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1206-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Heart Rhythm. 2018. PMID: 29572087 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
HRS policy statement: clinical cardiac electrophysiology fellowship curriculum: update 2011.Heart Rhythm. 2011 Aug;8(8):1340-56. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jun 14. Heart Rhythm. 2011. PMID: 21699868 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Left ventricular electrical potential measured by the NOGA XP electromechanical mapping method as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 4;10:1107415. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107415. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37215549 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-Implant Assessment For Optimal LV Lead Placement In CRT: ECG, ECHO, or MRI?J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Aug 31;8(2):1280. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1280. eCollection 2015 Aug-Sep. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015. PMID: 27957193 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Evidence and Recommendations for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014 May;3(1):9-14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2011.3.1.9. Epub 2014 May 30. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014. PMID: 26835058 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous