Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Jan;47(1):125-31.
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.41. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

Prognostic value of response after upfront therapy for acute GVHD

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prognostic value of response after upfront therapy for acute GVHD

R M Saliba et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

One challenge in designing clinical trials for treatment of acute GVHD (aGVHD) is the lack of an established standardized end point to measure the success of therapies. To facilitate assessment of end points in clinical trials for treatment of aGVHD in the current allo-SCT era, a national workshop was recently organized. In this study, which was presented at the workshop, we evaluated the prognostic value of response to upfront therapy in a cohort of 83 patients who had been enrolled on two clinical trials testing novel therapies for aGVHD at our institution. Our results indicate that patients whose aGVHD has a CR or PR by day 28 after initiation of systemic therapy have a significantly lower 6-month cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (16%) than patients whose aGVHD did not respond to therapy by day 28 (48%, P=0.005). Multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the impact of response on NRM is independent of patient and aGVHD characteristics. Our data confirm the validity of using day-28 response as a primary end point in clinical trials for upfront therapy for aGVHD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution (%) of response to therapy for aGVHD over time. Patients who received salvage therapy were coded as ‘‘PD’’ irrespective of response to salvage. Response on day 28 was unknown in two patients who died at 3 and 15 months from study entry due to underlying malignancy and stroke, respectively. NE, non-evaluable: two patients died of aGVHD on days 12 and 15 from study entry and were not evaluable for day-28 assessment. MR, mixed response; NR, no response; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of NRM according to aGVHD grade and response to upfront therapy.

References

    1. Martin PJ, Bachier CR, Klingemann HG, McCarthy PL, Szabolcs P, Uberti JP, et al. Endpoints for clinical trials testing treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a joint statement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:777–784. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin PJ, Nash RA. Pitfalls in the design of clinical trials for prevention or treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(Suppl 2):31–36. - PubMed
    1. Alousi AM, Weisdorf DJ, Logan BR, Bolanos-Meade J, Carter S, Difronzo N, et al. Etanercept, mycophenolate, denileukin, or pentostatin plus corticosteroids for acute graft-versus-host disease: a randomized phase 2 trial from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Blood. 2009;114:511–517. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Couriel DR, Saliba R, de Lima M, Giralt S, Andersson B, Khouri I, et al. A phase III study of infliximab and corticosteroids for the initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1555–1562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–828. - PubMed

MeSH terms