Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;21(4):428-43.
doi: 10.1002/hec.1723. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

Does managed care affect the diffusion of psychotropic medications?

Affiliations

Does managed care affect the diffusion of psychotropic medications?

Marisa E Domino. Health Econ. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Newer technologies to treat many mental illnesses have shown substantial heterogeneity in diffusion rates across states. In this paper, I investigate whether variation in the level of managed care penetration is associated with changes in state-level diffusion of three newer classes of psychotropic medications in fee-for-service Medicaid programs from 1991 to 2005. Three different types of managed care programs are examined: capitated managed care, any type of managed care and behavioral health carve-outs. A fourth-order polynomial fixed effect regression model is used to model the diffusion path of newer antidepressant and antipsychotic medications controlling for time-varying state characteristics. Substantial differences are found in the diffusion paths by the degree of managed care use in each state Medicaid program. The largest effect is seen through spillover effects of capitated managed care programs; states with greater capitated managed care have greater initial shares of newer psychotropic medications. The influence of carve-outs and of all types of managed care combined on the diffusion path was modest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 4
Figure 4. The Predicted Retraction Path of Older Psychotropic by Level of Capitated Managed Care Enrollment in State
Figure 4a: Non-SSRI or SNRI Antidepressants Figure 4b: First generation antipsychotics
Figure 1
Figure 1. The Predicted Diffusion Path of New Psychotropic by Level of Capitated Managed Care Enrollment in State
Figure 1a: SSRI diffusion Figure 1b: SNRI Diffusion Figure 1c: SGA Diffusion
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Predicted Diffusion Path of Second Generation antipsychotics by enrollment in any type of Managed Care
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Predicted Diffusion Path of New Psychotropic Medications by Carve-out status
Figure 3a: SSRI diffusion Figure 3b: SNRI Diffusion Figure 3c: SGA Diffusion

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen B. The Hunt for S-shaped Growth Paths in Technological Innovation: a Patent Study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1999;9:487–526.
    1. Baker LC. The Effect of HMOs on Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures: Evidence from Medicare. Journal of Health Economics. 1997;16(4):453–481. - PubMed
    1. Baker LC. Association of Managed Care Market Share and Health Expenditures for Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients. JAMA. 1999;281(5):432–437. - PubMed
    1. Barrett B, Byford S, et al. Evidence of cost-effective treatments for depression:a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005;84(1):1–13. - PubMed
    1. Berndt ER, Bhattacharjya A, et al. An Analysis of the Diffusion of New Antidepressants: Variety, Quality, and Marketing Efforts. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 2002;5:3–19. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances