Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 8:11:153.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-153.

Smoking differences between employees in faculties of the University of Tartu, Estonia, and changes during the country's transition

Affiliations

Smoking differences between employees in faculties of the University of Tartu, Estonia, and changes during the country's transition

Simo Näyhä et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A previous study found marked differences in smoking between employees in various university faculties in Tartu, Estonia, soon after the disruption of communism. The present study was conducted to see whether such differences still exist and how the patterns had changed during the country's first transitional decade.

Methods: All employees at the University of Tartu (UT) were surveyed for smoking habits by means of a questionnaire in 1992 and 2003. The present paper is based on respondents whose faculty or workplace was known (1390 people in 1992, 1790 in 2003). Smoking differences were assessed in terms of regression-based adjusted figures.

Results: While 20% of the male employees smoked daily in 1992, 13% did so in 2003, the figures for females being 10% and 7%, respectively. The prevalence of men's daily smoking varied between faculties and other workplaces in the range 4-30% in 1992, and 0-24% in 2003, with corresponding ranges of 3-21% and 0-10% among females. Men in the medical faculty in both surveys, and those in the faculty of philosophy in the second survey showed higher rates than men in most other faculties, as did women in the faculty of law in the first survey and those in the faculty of philosophy in the second. The figures were usually low in the faculties of sports & exercise, physics & chemistry and mathematics. The sex pattern was reversed in the faculty of law and also in that of economics, where the women smoked more than the men.

Conclusions: Even in this low-smoking academic community, wide smoking differences existed between the faculties and other workplaces. Faculties where physical or mental performance is of prime importance are leading the way towards a smoke-free community, while men in the faculty of philosophy and, paradoxically, men in the medical faculty are lagging behind. The reversed sex ratio in the faculties of law and economics may indicate women's intensified drive for equality in this transitional society. We assume that different professional cultures may introduce variations in smoking patterns, thereby modifying the course of the smoking epidemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Smoking differences among University of Tartu employees by faculties and other workplaces. Circles and numbers show model-based differences vis-à-vis the medical faculty (in percentage points), adjusted for age and occupational group, and horizontal bars indicate their 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated change in daily smoking between the surveys among University of Tartu employees, by faculties and other workplaces. Numbers show model-based changes (in percentage points) between survey I (1992) and survey II (2003), adjusted for age and occupational group, and vertical bars indicate their 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Consistency of faculty differences in daily smoking between survey I (1992) and survey II (2003), separately for men and women, and between men and women, separately for surveys I and II. Upper row: Regression of smoking in survey II on smoking in survey I. Lower row: Regression of women's on men's smoking. Points indicate prevalence differences (in percentage points) vis-à-vis the medical faculty, adjusted for age and occupation. Solid lines are weighted linear regressions of the differences and dashed lines their 95% confidence bands. b is the regression slope (95% confidence interval).

References

    1. Lynch GW. Smoking habits of medical and non-medical university staff. Changes since R.C.P. Report. Brit Med J. 1963;1:852–825. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5334.852. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown CN, Gunn AD. Tobacco-smoking in a university community. Public Health. 1975;89:199–205. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(75)80005-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavelaars AEJM, Kunst AE, Geurts JJM, Crialesi R, Grötvedt L, Helmert U, Lahelma E, Lundberg O, Matheson J, Mielcj A, Rasmussen NK, Regidor E, do Rosário-Giraldes M, Spuhler T, Mackenbach JP. Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. Brit Med J. 2000;320:1102–1107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1102. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helasoja VV, Lahelma E, Prättälä RS, Patja KM, Klumbiene J, Pudule I, Kasmel A. Determinants of daily smoking in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Finland in 1994-2002. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:353–362. doi: 10.1080/14034940500414766. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heikkinen R, Kivastik J, Kingisepp PH, Hirvonen L, Näyhä S. Smoking differences between university faculties in Tartu, Estonia, and Oulu, Finland, after the disruption of communism. Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51:381–391. doi: 10.1007/s00038-006-5090-x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types