Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1990;239(4):246-56.
doi: 10.1007/BF01738579.

Intracranial haemodynamics in patients with spontaneous carotid dissection. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound follow-up studies

Affiliations
Case Reports

Intracranial haemodynamics in patients with spontaneous carotid dissection. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound follow-up studies

M Kaps et al. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1990.

Abstract

In this study 11 patients aged between 34 and 57 years with clinical and angiographic findings typical of carotid dissection were thoroughly examined with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) repeatedly during a follow-up period of 1-6 months. Stagnating blood flow velocities in the downstream middle cerebral artery (MCA) were recorded initially as well as enhanced velocities due to postischaemic hyperperfusion syndrome. MCA embolism originating from the extracranial carotid artery with or without resolution could be detected by TCD in 5 cases. TCD findings in another 2 cases pointed to haemodynamic upset. In 3 cases, clinical as well as TCD data did not allow strict differentiation between embolic and haemodynamic complications, suggesting more complex pathophysiological mechanisms as the cause of infarction. Carotid recanalization was seen in 9 cases. The follow-up investigations moreover demonstrated that intracranial haemodynamics may change from day to day in patients suffering from internal carotid artery dissection. TCD data may thus improve the understanding of pathogenetics as well as rationales for individual therapeutic intervention in this particular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):648-9 - PubMed
    1. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1987;143(2):115-20 - PubMed
    1. Neuroradiology. 1985;27(6):588-92 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 1987 Jul-Aug;18(4):689-90 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 1981 Jan;8(1):83-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources