Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 15:3:51-9.
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S16114.

Subgroup analysis of large trials can guide further research: a case study of vitamin E and pneumonia

Affiliations

Subgroup analysis of large trials can guide further research: a case study of vitamin E and pneumonia

Harri Hemilä et al. Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Biology is complex and the effects of many interventions may vary between population groups. Subgroup analysis can give estimates for specific populations, but trials are usually too small for such analyses.

Purpose: To test whether the effect of vitamin E on pneumonia risk is uniform over subgroups defined by smoking and exercise.

Methods: The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study examined the effects of vitamin E (50 mg per day) and β-carotene (20 mg per day) on lung cancer in 29,133 male smokers aged 50-69 years using a 2 × 2 factorial design. The trial was conducted among the general community in Finland during 1985-1993; the intervention lasted for 6.0 years (median). In the present study, we tested the uniformity of vitamin E effect on the risk of hospital-treated pneumonia (898 cases) by adding a dummy variable to allow each subgroup its own vitamin E effect in a Cox model covering all participants.

Results: Vitamin E effect was not uniform over eight subgroups defined by baseline smoking (5-19 vs ≥20 cigarettes per day), age of smoking initiation (≤20 vs ≥21 years), and exercise during leisure time (yes vs no). Vitamin E decreased pneumonia risk by 69% (95% CI: 43% to 83%) among participants who had the least exposure to smoking and exercised during leisure time. Vitamin E increased pneumonia risk by 79% (95% CI: 27% to 150%) among those who had the highest exposure to smoking and did not exercise.

Limitations: Although the evidence of heterogeneity is strong, it is not evident to what extent the estimates of effect or the limits between the subgroups can be extrapolated to other populations.

Conclusion: Subgroup analysis of large trials should be encouraged, though caution is needed in the interpretation of findings. The role of vitamin E in susceptibility to pneumonia in physically active nonsmokers warrants further study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00342992.

Keywords: leisure time exercise; pneumonia; smoking; subgroup analysis; vitamin E; α-tocopherol; β-carotene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vitamin E and pneumonia risk in ATBC Study participants who started smoking at ≥21 years, smoked 5–19 cigarettes per day, and exercised (n = 2,216). Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard functions for vitamin E and no-vitamin E groups are shown. Each step indicates one case of pneumonia. For the difference between the two survival curves, the logrank test gives P = 0.00005. The survival curves are cut at 7.2 years because the number of participants declines abruptly thereafter (no cases after 6.8 years). At six-year follow-up 576 and 535 participants remained in the vitamin E and the no-vitamin E groups, respectively.

References

    1. Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet. 2000;355:1064–1069. - PubMed
    1. Altman DG. Within trial variation–a false trail? J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:301–303. - PubMed
    1. Freemantle N. Interpreting the results of secondary end points and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: should we lock the crazy aunt in the attic? BMJ. 2001;322:989–991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer. 1977;35:1–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:229–236. - PubMed

Associated data