Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Nov;35(11):1655-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1227-5. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study

Lei Zhang  1 , Jinyou Zheng, Weiliang Wang, Guangmao Lin, Yijiang Huang, Jin Zheng, Ghamor-Amegavi Edem Prince, Guojing Yang
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study

Lei Zhang et al. Int Orthop. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of medial support screws for locking plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients underwent prospective treatment for proximal humerus fractures with locking plates between October 2007 and September 2008. Sixty-eight patients accomplished a mean 30.8-month follow-up and were randomized into two groups: 39 patients were treated with only a locking plate and were classified in the -MSS (medial support screw) group, and 29 patients were included in the + MSS group, which were fixed with additional medial support screws. Clinical and radiological investigations were performed in both groups.

Results: The fractures united at an average of 13.6 weeks after final surgery. Comparably better shoulder function recovery was achieved in the +MSS group with regard to the Constant shoulder score (P = 0.01), with the respective excellent and good rates of 79% and 62%. Eleven patients developed various complications. A statistical difference (P = 0.036) was observed regarding the failure rate (23.1% in the -MSS group vs. 3.4% in the +MSS group). The early loss of fixation was related to higher age (P < 0.001) and less initial neck-shaft angle (NSA) (P = 0.011) of the patients. However, bone mineral density was not significantly associated with loss of fixation (P = 0.076). Although no difference was found in all types of the fractures between the +MSS and -MSS groups regarding immediate postoperative NSA, we observed a significantly lower final NSA in the -MSS group and greater secondary angle loss in the subgroup of Neer three-part (P = 0.033 and 0.015, respectively) and four-part fractures (P = 0.043 and 0.027).

Conclusions: Anatomical reduction can substantially decrease the risk of postoperative failure in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures. Medial support for proximal humerus fractures seems to have no benefits in Neer two-part fractures. However, the additional medial support screws inserted into the medio-inferior region of the humeral head may help to enhance mechanical stability in complex fractures and allow for better maintenance of reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A PHILOS locking plate was applied for proximal humerus fracture. Note that a medial support screw (arrow) was used to fix the medio-inferior region of the humeral head. ∠CEF represents neck-shaft angle (about 140°). Line AB refers to the line between the superior and inferior border of the articular surface of the humeral head. Line CD is perpendicular to line AB and goes through the centre of the humeral head. Line EF refers to the axial line of the humeral shaft
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agudelo J, Schurmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10):676–681. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815bb09d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Nonunions of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:46–50. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Warner JJP. Nonprosthetic management of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(8):1578–1593.
    1. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Demetrakopoulos D, Brophy RH, Grose A, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):1962–1967. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roderer G, Gebhard F, Krischak G, Wilke HJ, Claes L. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of fixed angle plating using a new concept of locking for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Int Orthop. 2010 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types