Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 1;130(3):631-40.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.26039. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

Analysis of retinoblastoma age incidence data using a fully stochastic cancer model

Affiliations

Analysis of retinoblastoma age incidence data using a fully stochastic cancer model

Mark P Little et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Retinoblastoma (RB) is an important ocular malignancy of childhood. It has been commonly accepted for some time that knockout of the two alleles of the RB1 gene is the principal molecular target associated with the occurrence of RB. In this article, we examine the validity of the two-hit theory for RB by comparing the fit of a stochastic model with two or more mutational stages. Unlike many such models, our model assumes a fully stochastic stem cell compartment, which is crucial to its behavior. Models are fitted to a population-based dataset comprising 1,553 cases of RB for the period 1962-2000 in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales). The population incidence of RB is best described by a fully stochastic model with two stages, although models with a deterministic stem cell compartment yield equivalent fit; models with three or more stages fit much less well. The results strongly suggest that knockout of the two alleles of the RB1 gene is necessary and may be largely sufficient for the development of RB, in support of Knudson's two-hit hypothesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The observed and predicted age-specific incidences (with 95% CI) of bilateral and unilateral RB cases in the general population from 1962 to 2000, from the optimal model with bilateral 1-stage + unilateral 2-stage models, no latency, reduced stochastic delay model with separate adjustment for RB1 heterozygous and RB1 wildtype homozygous unilateral cases, G20+=G10+, D20+=D10+, with population prevalence of RB1 heterozygotes constrained to be 2.0 × 10−5 (Tables 3, A2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The number of susceptible retinal cells predicted by the optimal model with bilateral 1-stage + unilateral 2-stage models, no latency, reduced stochastic delay model with separate adjustment for RB1 heterozygous and RB1 wildtype homozygous unilateral cases, G20+=G10+, D20+=D10+, with population prevalence of RB1 heterozygotes constrained to be 2.0 × 10−5 (Tables 3, A2).

References

    1. Melamud A, Palekar R, Singh A. Retinoblastoma. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Mar 15;73(6):1039–1044. - PubMed
    1. Corson TW, Gallie BL. One hit, two hits, three hits, more? Genomic changes in the development of retinoblastoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007 Jul;46(7):617–634. - PubMed
    1. Francke U. Retinoblastoma and chromosome 13. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1976;12(7):131–134. - PubMed
    1. Fung YK, Murphree AL, T'Ang A, Qian J, Hinrichs SH, Benedict WF. Structural evidence for the authenticity of the human retinoblastoma gene. Science. 1987 Jun 26;236(4809):1657–1661. - PubMed
    1. Knudson AG., Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):820–823. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types