Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;33(1):235-45.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21208. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Neural basis of single-word reading in Spanish-English bilinguals

Affiliations

Neural basis of single-word reading in Spanish-English bilinguals

Nasheed I Jamal et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Brain imaging studies have identified a left-lateralized network of regions that are engaged when monolinguals read. However, for individuals who are native speakers of two languages, it is unclear whether this pattern of activity is maintained across both languages or if it deviates according to language-specific properties. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate single-word processing in Spanish and in English in 12 proficient early Spanish-English bilinguals matched in skill level in both languages. Word processing in Spanish engaged the left inferior frontal and left middle temporal gyri. Word processing in English activated the left inferior frontal, middle frontal, and fusiform gyri extending to inferior temporal gyrus and the right middle temporal gyrus extending into superior temporal sulcus. The comparison of reading in Spanish greater than reading in English revealed involvement of the left middle temporal gyrus extending into the superior temporal sulcus. English greater than Spanish, however, demonstrated greater engagement of the left middle frontal gyrus extending into the superior frontal gyrus. We conclude that although word processing in either language activates classical areas associated with reading, there are language-specific differences, which can be attributed to the disparity in orthographic transparency. English, an orthographically deep language, may require greater engagement of the frontal regions for phonological coding, whereas Spanish allows increased access to semantic processing via the left middle temporal areas. Together, these results suggest that bilinguals will show adjustments to the typical neural representation of reading as necessitated by the demands of the orthography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual languages. (A) Word processing in Spanish elicited activation in the left middle temporal and inferior frontal gyri (Z > 3.1, P < 0.001). (B) Word processing in English engaged left hemisphere fusiform gyrus extending to inferior temporal gyrus as well as inferior frontal and middle frontal gyri. In the right hemisphere, activation was seen in middle temporal gyrus extending into superior temporal sulcus. (C) Word processing in both Spanish and English activated an eight‐voxel cluster in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Brain renderings created with VolView 2.0 used templates with transparency values on a scale on which 0 equals complete transparency and 100 equals complete opacity. For (A) and (B), images were set to a transparency value of 75. For (C), a transparency value of 55 was used.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparisons. Contrast of Spanish greater than English showed activation in the left middle temporal gyrus extending into the superior temporal sulcus (Z > 3.1, P < 0.001). The opposite comparison, English greater than Spanish, found more engagement of the left middle frontal gyrus extending into the superior frontal gyrus.

References

    1. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL ( 2009): Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta‐analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 19: 2767–2796. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binder JR, McKiernan KA, Parsons ME, Westbury CF, Possing ET, Kaufman JN, Buchanan L ( 2003): Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 372–393. - PubMed
    1. Bolger DJ, Hornickel J, Cone NE, Burman DD, Booth JR ( 2008): Neural correlates of orthographic and phonological consistency effects in children. Hum Brain Mapp 29: 1416–1429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunswick N, McCrory E, Price CJ, Frith CD, Frith U ( 1999): Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics: A search for Wernicke's Wortschatz? Brain 122: 1901–1917. - PubMed
    1. Burton MW, Locasto PC, Krebs‐Noble D, Gullapalli RP ( 2005): A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing. NeuroImage 26: 647–661. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources