Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;59(3):524-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03300.x.

Transitions in frailty status in older adults in relation to mobility: a multistate modeling approach employing a deficit count

Affiliations

Transitions in frailty status in older adults in relation to mobility: a multistate modeling approach employing a deficit count

Nader Fallah et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate how changes in frailty status and mortality risk relate to baseline frailty state, mobility performance, age, and sex.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: The Yale Precipitating Events Project, New Haven, Connecticut.

Participants: Seven hundred fifty-four community-dwelling people aged 70 and older at baseline followed up at 18, 36, and 54 months.

Measurements: Frailty status, assessed at 18-month intervals, was defined using a frailty index (FI) as the number of deficits in 36 health variables. Mobility was defined as time in seconds on the rapid gait test, in which participants walked back and forth over a 20-foot course as quickly as possible. Multistate transition probabilities were calculated with baseline frailty, mobility, age, and sex estimated using Poisson and logistic regressions in survivors and those who died, respectively.

Results: In multivariable analyses, baseline frailty status and age were significantly associated with changes in frailty status and risk of death, whereas mobility was significantly associated with the frailty but not with mortality. At all values of the FI, participants with better mobility were more likely than those with poor mobility to remain stable or to improve. For example, at 54 months, 20.6% (95% confidence interval (CI)=16-25.2) of participants with poor mobility had the same or fewer deficits, compared with 32.4% (95% CI=27.9-36.9) of those with better mobility.

Conclusion: A multistate transition model effectively measured the probability of change in frailty status and risk of death. Mobility, age, and baseline frailty were significant factors in frailty state transitions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in frailty status (deficit count) in relation to baseline mobility for three consecutive follow-up assessments. The probability of improvement or stability is indicated in white, worsening is shown in grey, and probability of death is shown in black. The probabilities of the outcomes among participants with poor mobility (>10 sec on rapid gait test) are shown at the left panels; the probabilities of the outcomes among participants with good mobility are presented at the right panels. The upper panels show the transition probabilities after the first 18 months, the middle panels displays the probabilities of transitions between baseline and 36 months and the bottom panel shows the probabilities between baseline and 54 months. The last state (10+) refers to the “collapsed states” for those who had 10 deficits and over (<8%).

References

    1. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Scientific World Journal. 2001;1:323–336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitnitski A, Song X, Skoog I, et al. Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:2184–2189. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62A:722–727. - PubMed
    1. Goggins WB, Woo J, Sham A, et al. Frailty index as a measure of biological age in a Chinese population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:1046–1051. - PubMed
    1. Kulminski AM, Arbeev KG, Ukraintseva SV, et al. Changes in health status among participants of the Framingham Heart Study from the 1960s to the 1990s: application of an index of cumulative deficits. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:696–701. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types