Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jun;12(3):203-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0179-z.

Complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer

K A Keegan et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the standard for detection of occult pelvic nodal metastases from prostate cancer, and may be performed separately from or at the time of radical prostatectomy. In addition to its potential for diagnostic staging, a PLND may be therapeutic in some patients. However, considerable debate centers on the appropriate candidates for the procedure, the extent and proper boundaries of dissection, optimal surgical approach, and absolute oncologic benefit. Several series suggest that there likely is limited benefit of PLND in low-risk patients and that PLND can be safely omitted in a high percentage of men undergoing contemporary radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, the value of PLND in patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease must be balanced against the potential morbidity of the procedure. In the setting of this debate, concern over morbidity directly attributable to this procedure is of paramount importance. This review focuses on the complications associated with PLND, including lymphocele, thromboembolic events, ureteral injury, nerve injury, vascular injury, and lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1278-82; discussion 1283-4 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(3):218-21 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1382-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1891-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources