Comparison of reprogramming ability of mouse ES and iPS cells measured by somatic cell fusion
- PMID: 21404192
- DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.103204hs
Comparison of reprogramming ability of mouse ES and iPS cells measured by somatic cell fusion
Abstract
The ectopic expression of the key transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf-4 have been shown to reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state. In turn these induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, like embryonic stem (ES) cells, have been shown to be able to reprogram somatic cells by cell fusion. In this study we compare the differences and similarities between ES and iPS cells measured by somatic cell fusion to somatic cells harboring an Oct4-GFP transgene. We found that iPS cells were just as potent as ES cells at reprogramming the somatic genome as measured by Oct4-GFP reactivation. The resulting ES-somatic and iPS-somatic cell hybrids were characterized for expression of key pluripotency genes, immunostaining for Oct4, SSEA-1, and the ability to differentiate into cell types representative of the three germ layers. In addition to restoring pluripotency to the somatic genome following cell fusion, the telomere maintenance mechanisms of both the ES and iPS cells were found to be dominant in the resulting ES-somatic and iPS-somatic cell hybrids, resulting in the lengthening of the somatic telomeres following cellular reprogramming. Therefore this study supports the view that iPS cells can be virtually indistinguishable from ES cells, even with regard to their reprogramming ability.
Similar articles
-
Reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with induced pluripotent stem cells and nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells.Stem Cells Dev. 2010 Feb;19(2):239-46. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0142. Stem Cells Dev. 2010. PMID: 19637940
-
More synergetic cooperation of Yamanaka factors in induced pluripotent stem cells than in embryonic stem cells.Cell Res. 2009 Oct;19(10):1127-38. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.106. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Cell Res. 2009. PMID: 19736564
-
Cell fusion-induced reprogramming.Methods Mol Biol. 2010;636:179-90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-691-7_11. Methods Mol Biol. 2010. PMID: 20336523
-
[Induction and characterization of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells: a review].Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2010 Apr;26(4):421-30. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2010. PMID: 20575428 Review. Chinese.
-
Telomere rejuvenation during nuclear reprogramming.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010 Apr;20(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Feb 20. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010. PMID: 20176474 Review.
Cited by
-
Developmental Potency and Metabolic Traits of Extended Pluripotency Are Faithfully Transferred to Somatic Cells via Cell Fusion-Induced Reprogramming.Cells. 2022 Oct 17;11(20):3266. doi: 10.3390/cells11203266. Cells. 2022. PMID: 36291134 Free PMC article.
-
Trend of telomerase activity change during human iPSC self-renewal and differentiation revealed by a quartz crystal microbalance based assay.Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 10;4:6978. doi: 10.1038/srep06978. Sci Rep. 2014. PMID: 25381797 Free PMC article.
-
Nuclear transplantation between allogeneic cells through topological reconnection of plasma membrane in a microfluidic system.Biomicrofluidics. 2019 Jun 10;13(3):034115. doi: 10.1063/1.5098829. eCollection 2019 May. Biomicrofluidics. 2019. PMID: 31312284 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources