Religiousness as a factor of hesitation against doping behavior in college-age athletes
- PMID: 21409480
- DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9480-x
Religiousness as a factor of hesitation against doping behavior in college-age athletes
Abstract
Religiousness is rarely studied as protective factor against substance use and misuse in sport. Further, we have found no investigation where college-age athletes were sampled and studied accordingly. The aim of the present study was to identify gender-specific protective effects of the religiousness (measured by Santa Clara Questionnaire) and other social, educational, and sport variables as a potential factors of hesitation against doping behaviors in sport-science-students from Mostar, Bosnia, and Herzegovina (51 women and 111 men; age range, 18-26). The gender differences for the non-parametric variables were established by Kruskall-Wallis test, while for the parametric variables the t-test for independent samples was used. Multiple regression calculations revealed religiousness as the most significant predictor of the social, health, sport and legal factors of hesitation against doping behaviors in both genders. However, the differential influence of the social, educational, sport and religious factors in relation to negative consequences of the doping behaviors is found for men and women. Such differential influence must be emphasized in tailoring the anti-doping policy and interventions.
Similar articles
-
Gender- and Sport-Specific Associations Between Religiousness and Doping Behavior in High-Level Team Sports.J Relig Health. 2017 Aug;56(4):1348-1360. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0254-3. J Relig Health. 2017. PMID: 27167741
-
Can we consider religiousness as a protective factor against doping behavior in sport?J Relig Health. 2009 Dec;48(4):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9207-9. Epub 2008 Sep 26. J Relig Health. 2009. PMID: 19890720
-
Complex interaction of religiousness with other factors in relation to substance use and misuse among female athletes.J Relig Health. 2012 Jun;51(2):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9360-9. J Relig Health. 2012. PMID: 20446038
-
4. The use and misuse of performance-enhancing substances in sport.Med J Aust. 2006 Feb 6;184(3):132-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00153.x. Med J Aust. 2006. PMID: 16460300 Review.
-
Position stand on androgen and human growth hormone use.J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5 Suppl):S1-S59. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df2e6. J Strength Cond Res. 2009. PMID: 19620932 Review.
Cited by
-
Is there a danger for myopia in anti-doping education? Comparative analysis of substance use and misuse in Olympic racket sports calls for a broader approach.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 Oct 11;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-27. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011. PMID: 21988896 Free PMC article.
-
Gender- and Sport-Specific Associations Between Religiousness and Doping Behavior in High-Level Team Sports.J Relig Health. 2017 Aug;56(4):1348-1360. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0254-3. J Relig Health. 2017. PMID: 27167741
-
Toward Prevention of Doping in Youth Sport: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Correlates of Doping Tendency in Swimming.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;16(23):4851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234851. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31810337 Free PMC article.
-
Doping Attitudes and Covariates of Potential Doping Behaviour in High-Level Team-Sport Athletes; Gender Specific Analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2016 Dec 1;15(4):606-615. eCollection 2016 Dec. J Sports Sci Med. 2016. PMID: 27928206 Free PMC article.
-
Examination of the community-specific prevalence of and factors associated with substance use and misuse among Rural and Urban adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis in Bosnia and Herzegovina.BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 6;5(11):e009446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009446. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26546145 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources