Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement
- PMID: 21411493
- PMCID: PMC3175742
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d631
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement
Abstract
The number of known genetic markers of risk is increasing but the interpretation of their clinical effect is hampered by poor reporting of prediction studies. These guidelines from the GRIPS group aim to ensure transparent reporting of prediction studies
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the unified competing interest form at
Similar articles
-
Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: The GRIPS Statement.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 15;154(6):421-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21403077 No abstract available.
-
Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS Statement.PLoS Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):e1000420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000420. Epub 2011 Mar 15. PLoS Med. 2011. PMID: 21423587 Free PMC article.
-
Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS Statement.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):843-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21414754 No abstract available.
-
Strengthening the reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS statement.Genet Med. 2011 May;13(5):453-6. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318212fa82. Genet Med. 2011. PMID: 21502867 No abstract available.
-
Scientific reporting is suboptimal for aspects that characterize genetic risk prediction studies: a review of published articles based on the Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies statement.J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):487-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24411311 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the quality of published genetic association studies in meta-analyses: the quality of genetic studies (Q-Genie) tool.BMC Genet. 2015 May 15;16:50. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0211-2. BMC Genet. 2015. PMID: 25975208 Free PMC article.
-
The Potential Role for Host Genetic Profiling in Screening for Chlamydia-Associated Tubal Factor Infertility (TFI)-New Perspectives.Genes (Basel). 2019 May 28;10(6):410. doi: 10.3390/genes10060410. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31142036 Free PMC article.
-
Candidate Gene Association Studies of Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 27;7(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00075-1. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28232737 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Incorporating Common Genetic Variants: A Systematic Review.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Oct;28(10):1580-1593. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0059. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019. PMID: 31292139 Free PMC article.
-
Germline CDH1 Variants and Lifetime Cancer Risk.JAMA. 2024 Sep 3;332(9):722-729. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10852. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38873722 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, Dowling N, Moore CA, Bradley L, et al. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med 2007;9:665-74. - PubMed
-
- Kyzas PA, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP. Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: association with reported prognostic effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:236-43. - PubMed
-
- Kyzas PA, Loizou KT, Ioannidis JP. Selective reporting biases in cancer prognostic factor studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1043-55. - PubMed
-
- McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, et al. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2005;2:416-22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources