Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 21412757
- PMCID: PMC3136649
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25981
Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Background: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component of prostate cancer staging and treatment, especially for surgical patients who have high-risk tumor features. It is not clear how the shift from open radical prostatectomy (ORP) to minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) has affected the use of PLND. The objectives of this study were to identify predictors of PLND and to assess the impact of surgical technique in a contemporary, population-based cohort.
Methods: In Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, the authors identified men who underwent ORP or MIRP for prostate cancer during 2003 to 2007. The impact of surgical approach on PLND was evaluated, and interactions were examined between surgical procedure, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and Gleason score with the analysis controlled for patient and tumor characteristics.
Results: Of 6608 men who underwent ORP or MIRP, 70% (n = 4600) underwent PLND. The use of PLND declined over time both overall and within subgroups defined by procedure type. PLND was 5 times more likely in men who underwent ORP than in men who underwent MIRP when the analysis was controlled for patient and tumor characteristics. Elevated PSA and biopsy Gleason score, but not clinical stage, were associated with a greater odds of PLND in both the ORP group and the MIRP group. However, the magnitude of the association between these factors and PLND was significantly greater for patients in the ORP group.
Conclusions: PLND was less common among men who underwent MIRP, independent of tumor risk factors. A decline in PLND rates was not fully explained by an increase in MIRP. The authors concluded that these trends may signal a surgical approach-dependent disparity in prostate cancer staging and therapy.
Cancer 2011 © 2011 American Cancer Society.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.Urology. 2008 Sep;72(3):647-52; discussion 652-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.067. Epub 2008 Jul 23. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18649928
-
Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26117216
-
The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 2. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24411705
-
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15028451 Review.
-
Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.Urol Int. 2019;103(2):125-136. doi: 10.1159/000497280. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Urol Int. 2019. PMID: 31039571 Review.
Cited by
-
Suboptimal use of pelvic lymph node dissection: Differences in guideline adherence between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Aug;10(7-8):269-276. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3563. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016. PMID: 27878050 Free PMC article.
-
External Validation of the Briganti Nomogram to Predict Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer-Setting a New Threshold Value.Life (Basel). 2021 May 25;11(6):479. doi: 10.3390/life11060479. Life (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34070313 Free PMC article.
-
A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):206-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11638.x. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23356747 Free PMC article.
-
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic prostatectomy: antegrade versus retrograde technique.BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01448-1. BMC Urol. 2024. PMID: 38515053 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures.J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):748-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0266. Epub 2011 Nov 8. J Endourol. 2012. PMID: 22050490 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Health NCI-USNIo. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/prostate.
-
- Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol. 2000;163:1802–7. - PubMed
-
- Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302:1557–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous