Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery
- PMID: 21412963
- DOI: 10.1002/rcs.380
Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery
Abstract
Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer is very challenging to many surgeons. Information regarding the advantage of using the Da Vinci robotic system over conventional open surgery for PD is rare. Therefore, a comparison of the outcomes of PD performed using the Da Vinci robotic system with outcomes using open surgery was conducted.
Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2009 sixteen patients underwent PD, eight patients receiving robot-assisted surgery using the Da Vinci surgical robotic system (Group I) and eight being treated using conventional open surgery (Group II).
Results: There was no significant difference in radical resection (R0) rate between the two groups, 87.5% vs 100%, P = 0.05. The operative time in group I was longer than in group II, 718 ± 186 vs 420 ± 127 min, P = 0.011, while the surgical blood loss in group I was less than in group II, 153 ± 43 vs 210 ± 53 mL, P = 0.045. The length of bed time and hospital stay after surgery in group I were shorter than in group II, 27.5 ± 7.1 vs 96 ± 18.1 h, P = 0.000; 16.4 ± 4.1 vs 24.3 ± 7.1 days, P = 0.04, respectively). Complication rate of group I was lower than that of group II, 25% vs 75%, P = 0.05.
Conclusion: It is feasible and safe to perform PD using the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system; patients recovered faster postoperatively with less blood loss during surgery.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach.Pancreas. 2010 Mar;39(2):160-4. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bd604e. Pancreas. 2010. PMID: 19910835
-
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome.Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):763-7. Singapore Med J. 2009. PMID: 19710972
-
Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems.Int J Med Robot. 2006 Dec;2(4):299-304. doi: 10.1002/rcs.104. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520647
-
Robotic abdominal surgery.Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4A Suppl):19S-26S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.020. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15476648 Review.
-
Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.Curr Opin Oncol. 2008 Sep;20(5):581-9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328307c7ec. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 19106665 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional and Immunological Statuses: A Single-Institution Propensity Score-Matched Study.Ann Surg Open. 2024 Aug 30;5(3):e487. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000487. eCollection 2024 Sep. Ann Surg Open. 2024. PMID: 39310352 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open middle pancreatectomy: short-term results of a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):962-971. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5046-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27402095 Clinical Trial.
-
First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.Singapore Med J. 2020 Nov;61(11):598-604. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019119. Epub 2019 Sep 19. Singapore Med J. 2020. PMID: 31535153 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16730. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016730. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31393381 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):544-550. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06792-0. Epub 2019 Apr 23. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31016458
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources