Cup size and risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 21414747
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.015
Cup size and risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
We evaluated the relationship between cup diameter and dislocation risk in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a 28-mm head. There were 50 dislocations, 28 of which occurred in 2221 (1.3%) THAs with a cup diameter smaller than 56 mm and 22 in 513 (4.3%) with a cup diameter of 56 mm or larger. Dislocation risk varied between 0.6% and 2.4% in the smaller cup group and between 4.1% and 5.2% in the larger cup group. The risk was substantially higher in the large cup group (unadjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-6.2). Multivariable logistic regression revealed an adjusted odds ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.9). Patients with THA (28-mm head) had more than twice the risk of dislocation with cup size of 56 mm or higher compared to patients with smaller cups.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.026. Epub 2009 Jul 4. J Arthroplasty. 2009. PMID: 19577890
-
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Dec;128(12):1379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0731-6. Epub 2008 Aug 30. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008. PMID: 18758793
-
Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Feb;97(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011. PMID: 21177149
-
[Dislocation of total hip prostheses; risk factors and treatment].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Feb 15;147(7):286-90. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003. PMID: 12622005 Review. Dutch.
-
Use of modular large femoral heads without liners in hip arthroplasty.Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:217-20. Surg Technol Int. 2006. PMID: 17029179 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Acetabular Implant Design on Aseptic Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jan 7;7:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.017. eCollection 2021 Feb. Arthroplast Today. 2021. PMID: 33521199 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional pre-operative planning of primary hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Dec 4;5(12):845-855. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200046. eCollection 2020 Dec. EFORT Open Rev. 2020. PMID: 33425373 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Findings of preoperative patient risk factors to predict dislocation following total hip arthroplasty.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 May 15;13:1601997. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1601997. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025. PMID: 40443733 Free PMC article.
-
Is Femoral Head to Acetabular Cup Ratio Associated With Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty?Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(2):61-66. Iowa Orthop J. 2024. PMID: 39811172 Free PMC article.
-
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26150264 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical