Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;51(2):230-42.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker086. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review

Keith T Palmer  1 , Elizabeth C Harris, Cathy Linaker, Mary Barker, Wendy Lawrence, Cyrus Cooper, David Coggon
Affiliations

Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review

Keith T Palmer et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of interventions in community and workplace settings to reduce sickness absence and job loss in workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, published since 1990, were identified by screening citations from 35 earlier systematic reviews and by searching MEDLINE and Embase until April 2010. Effects were estimated by intervention category and other features, including study quality.

Results: Among 42 studies (including 34 RCTs), 27 assessed return to work (RTW), 21 duration of sickness absence and 5 job loss. Interventions included exercise therapy, behavioural change techniques, workplace adaptations and provision of additional services. Studies were typically small {median sample 107 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 77-148]} and limited in quality. Most interventions appeared beneficial: the median relative risk (RR) for RTW was 1.21 (IQR 1.00-1.60) and that for avoiding MSD-related job loss was 1.25 (IQR 1.06-1.71); the median reduction in sickness absence was 1.11 (IQR 0.32-3.20) days/month. However, effects were smaller in larger and better-quality studies, suggesting publication bias. No intervention was clearly superior, although effort-intensive interventions were less effective than simple ones. No cost-benefit analyses established statistically significant net economic benefits.

Conclusion: As benefits are small and of doubtful cost-effectiveness, employers' practice should be guided by their value judgements about the uncertainties. Expensive interventions should be implemented only with rigorous cost-benefit evaluation planned from the outset. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of simple, low-cost interventions, and further explore impacts on job retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the review’s identification, screening, and selection stages
Figure 2
Figure 2
Return to work – all comparisons, intervention vs. control
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Economic and Social Data Service Nesstar Catalogue http://nesstar.esds.ac.uk/webview/(accessed 9/08/10)
    1. Health and Safety Executive Self-reported work-related illness (SWI) and workplace injuries: Results from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) - Index of tables. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/lfs/index.htm(accessed 9/08/10)
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? The Stationery Office; London: 2006. ISBN 0 11 7036943.
    1. Hillage J, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Jagger N, Carroll C, Booth A. Evidence review 1: Review of the Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Interventions, Strategies, Programmes and Policies to reduce the number of employees who move from short-term to long-term sickness absence and to help employees on long-term sickness absence return to work (May 2008) http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH19EvidenceReview1.pdf(accessed 9/08/10)
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Managing Long-Term Sickness Absence and Incapacity for Work. NICE publications; London: 2009. NICE public health guidance 19. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH19Guidance.pdf(accessed 9/08/10)

Publication types