Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;25(8):2684-91.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1630-4. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

Laparoscopic posterior sectoral bile duct injury: the emerging role of nonoperative management with improved long-term results after delayed diagnosis

Affiliations

Laparoscopic posterior sectoral bile duct injury: the emerging role of nonoperative management with improved long-term results after delayed diagnosis

M T P R Perera et al. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Right posterior sectoral bile duct (RPSD) anomalies seen in up to 8% of the population rarely are injured at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Paucity of data on the management of these injuries led the authors to conduct this study aimed at reviewing management strategies for laparoscopic RPSD injuries at a specialist center.

Methods: Of 221 patients, 15 (6.7%; 4 men; mean age, 51 years; range, 21-75 years) treated between 1992 and 2009 for injuries to the RPSD were followed up for a median of 58 months (range, 7-208 months). Case notes, imaging, and follow-up data were reviewed.

Results: The RPSD injury was immediately recognized in 3 (20%) of the 15 patients, whereas in the remaining patients, biliary injury was suspected on day 1 (range, 1-18 days) due to bile leak/biloma. The diagnosis of RPSD injury was made by a combination of investigations including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n = 11), drain tube cholangiogram (n = 10), on-table cholangiogram (n = 3), and nuclear scan (n = 3). An intact common bile duct and absence of RPSD were identified on cholangiography (ERCP and on-table cholangiogram), whereas drain tube cholangiogram demonstrated a leaking RPSD in all cases. The majority of the patients (8/15, 53%) were managed nonoperatively with combined percutaneous drainage and endoscopic stenting, whereas six patients (40%) were managed with biliary reconstruction (immediate: n = 2; delayed 14-87 days: n = 4). Clinical and radiologic confirmation of complete cessation of bile leak was demonstrated 56 days (range, 7-62 days) after injury. The long-term outcome included a dilated right duct system with transient elevation of liver function tests in two patients (1 each in the nonoperative and surgical management groups), whereas the remaining patients all remain well at this writing.

Conclusion: Bile leak in the presence of an intact common duct shown on cholangiogram should raise the suspicion of an RPSD injury. Expertise is needed to interpret the absence of RPSD in these cases. Drain tube cholangiogram is an important adjunctive investigation. In selected cases, the results of nonoperative management alone is comparable with the results of reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1996 Feb;83(2):171-5 - PubMed
    1. JSLS. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):323-6 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr;4(2):168-77 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1196-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Apr;90(3):243-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources