Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;46(2):137-51.
doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.556597.

Mathematical modeling of gene expression: a guide for the perplexed biologist

Affiliations
Review

Mathematical modeling of gene expression: a guide for the perplexed biologist

Ahmet Ay et al. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

The detailed analysis of transcriptional networks holds a key for understanding central biological processes, and interest in this field has exploded due to new large-scale data acquisition techniques. Mathematical modeling can provide essential insights, but the diversity of modeling approaches can be a daunting prospect to investigators new to this area. For those interested in beginning a transcriptional mathematical modeling project, we provide here an overview of major types of models and their applications to transcriptional networks. In this discussion of recent literature on thermodynamic, Boolean, and differential equation models, we focus on considerations critical for choosing and validating a modeling approach that will be useful for quantitative understanding of biological systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Analytical modeling approaches used in gene regulation studies
A) Thermodynamic or fractional occupancy model of gene expression. The first column shows a simplified enhancer region with two binding sites for a repressor (R) and an activator (A). The mathematical formulation below represents binding efficiency for the repressor site. In the second column, all four possible states of this enhancer region are shown. The third column represents the probability of this state occurring, which is not simply ¼ but rather a function of the protein concentration and quality of the binding site(s). The fourth column indicates the efficiencies with which a particular state drives gene expression. This maybe a simple additive expression of activators minus repressors, or a more complex expression. The last column represents the total expressions coming from each state (the probability that a state will occur multiplied by the potential of this configuration of proteins) and their summation, which provides a measure of the total output of the cis-element. B) Differential equation model of gene expression. In this case regulatory relationship between two genes is depicted. Synthesis of gene 1 (G 1) involves expression of mRNA (M 1) and translation of protein (P1), which regulates gene 2 (G 2). Both mRNA and protein are subjects to turnover and protein is subject to diffusion. mRNA and protein synthesis, degradation and diffusion events are shown at left. This process can be modeled with reaction-diffusion equations as shown at right. Each molecular constituent is assigned such an equation. C) Boolean model of gene expression. The network describing the regulatory relationships among four proteins is shown; the directed arrows show activation, and the blunt arrows show repression. Starting from initial state, three temporal steps are demonstrated. In this model, protein turnover occurs in one time interval and repression is assumed to be dominant over activation. Here, superscripts [1] and [0] indicate active or inactive states respectively. (A color version of the figure is available online.)

References

    1. Ackers GK, Johnson AD, Shea MA. Quantitative model for gene regulation by λ phage repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:1129–1133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert R, Othmer HG. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol. 2003;223:1–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnosti DN, Gray S, Barolo S, Zhou J, Levine M. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1996;15:3659–3666. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aza-Blanc P, Ramírez-Weber FA, Laget MP, Schwartz C, Kornberg TB. Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor. Cell. 1997;89:1043–1053. - PubMed
    1. Babloyantz A, Sanglier M. Chemical instabilities of “all-or-none” type in beta-galactosidase induction and active transport. FEBS Lett. 1972;23:364–366. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources