Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development
- PMID: 21420149
- PMCID: PMC3131416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.12.001
Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development
Abstract
Guidelines or diagnostic criteria in clinical practice assist physicians in their clinical decision-making and improve health outcomes for patients. Diagnostic and classification criteria should be based on evidence from rigorously conducted controlled studies. Formal group consensus methods have been developed to organize subjective judgments and to synthesize them with the available evidence. This review discusses 4 types of formal consensus methods used in the health field and their applications in rheumatology: the Delphi method, Nominal Group Technique, RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, and National Institutes of Health consensus development conference.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP. Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: A systematic review. Br Med J. 2009;18(5):385. - PubMed
-
- Chassin M. Appropriate investigation and treatment in clinical practice. London: Royal College of Physicians; 1989. How do we decide whether an investigation or procedure is appropriate; pp. 21–29.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. AHCPR clinical practice guideline program. report to congress. 1995.
-
- Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Oct;4(4):236–248. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
