Hypertension: meta-analyses: first-rank evidence or second-hand information?
- PMID: 21423247
- DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.39
Hypertension: meta-analyses: first-rank evidence or second-hand information?
Similar articles
-
Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;57(5):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.053. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21272751
-
Emerging Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension in the SPRINT Era.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Oct-Dec;11(4):204-5. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-4-204. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015. PMID: 27057287 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Are Guidelines for Treatment of Hypertension Trustworthy?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 18;73(23):3027-3030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.009. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31196461 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Amlodipine is the better partner].MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Apr 17;150(16):13-4. MMW Fortschr Med. 2008. PMID: 18557108 German. No abstract available.
-
Extended consensus on blood pressure variability beyond blood pressure for management of hypertension.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Jan;11(1):6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 25. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28040405 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Quality of Meta-Analyses for Randomized Trials in the Field of Hypertension: an Updated and Improved Systematic Review.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):71. doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0765-7. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017. PMID: 28785887
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical