Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;116(7):1027-38.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0648-y. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

Characterisation of indeterminate focal breast lesions on grey-scale ultrasound: role of ultrasound elastography

[Article in English, Italian]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Characterisation of indeterminate focal breast lesions on grey-scale ultrasound: role of ultrasound elastography

[Article in English, Italian]
T V Bartolotta et al. Radiol Med. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of ultrasound (US) elastography in characterising focal breast lesions classified as indeterminate on B-mode US.

Materials and methods: Eighty-four focal breast lesions, 64 benign and 20 malignant (mean diameter, 15.1 mm), detected but not characterised on B-mode US in 72 women, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) US category 3 (n=56) or category 4 (n=28), were studied with US elastography and classified in consensus by two radiologists according to a five-point colour scale. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of US elastography compared with conventional US were calculated in relation to microhistology (n=67) and cytology (n=17), which were used as the reference standard.

Results: A total of 65/84 (77.4%) lesions were correctly classified as benign or malignant using US elastography, whereas the remaining 19/84 (22.6%) were incorrectly assessed. There were no statistically significant differences between US elastography and B-mode US with regard to sensitivity (70% vs. 68.4%), specificity (79.6% vs. 78.5%), PPV (51.8% vs. 48.1%) and NPV 89% vs. 89.5% (p>0.5). By contrast, a statistically significant difference was noted in the evaluation of BI-RADS 3 lesions, in which US elastography had 50% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 30% PPV and 93.5% NPV compared with BI-RADS 4 lesions (78.6%, 57.1%, 64.7% and 72.7%) (p<0.5).

Conclusions: The high NPV of US elastography may help reduce the use of biopsy in BI-RADS 3 lesions, but its low PPV in BI-RADS 4 lesions does not allow avoidance of biopsy on the basis of the US elastographic score alone in this group of lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ultraschall Med. 2010 Oct;31(5):484-91 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Med. 2006 Dec;111(8):1078-86 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;110(1-2):69-76 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):341-50 - PubMed
    1. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Apr;28(4):413-20 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources